Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 40

Memorandum in Opposition re #33 MOTION to Dismiss Count VIII of Plaintiff's Complaint or, In the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement filed byOracle America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ballinger, Richard) (Filed on 10/28/2010)

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Doc. 40 Att. 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) [e-mail] MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) [e-mail] 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone] BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) [e-mail] 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone] STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) [e-mail] 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone] ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) [e-mail] DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) [e-mail] MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) [e-mail] 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] / Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC. Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant. Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT VII OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Date: November 18, 2010 Time: 8:00 am Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT VII OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Google Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count VII of Plaintiff's Complaint or, In The Alternative, for a More Definite Statement came for a hearing on November 18, 2010 before the Honorable William H. Alsup. The Court, having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the arguments presented at the hearing, and other matters relevant to the determination of the motion, hereby DENIES the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED, Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count VII of Plaintiff's Complaint or, In The Alternative, for a More Definite Statement is DENIED.

Dated: ________________ 2010

Honorable William H. Alsup United States District Court Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT VII OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA

1