Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 504

EXHIBITS re #503 Declaration in Support, (Exhibits G through K) filed by Oracle America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit H, #2 Exhibit I, #3 Exhibit J, #4 Exhibit K)(Related document(s) #503 ) (Muino, Daniel) (Filed on 10/7/2011) Modified on 10/11/2011 (wsn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) mdpeters@mofo.com DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624) dmuino@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 / Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 6 7 8 9 10 11 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) dboies@bsfllp.com 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 / Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 / Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 / Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 23 ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 24 Plaintiff, 25 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6), TOPICS 4-9 v. 26 Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA GOOGLE INC. 27 Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup Defendant. 28 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6), TOPICS 4-9 CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1470218 EXHIBIT J 1 TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC., AND TO ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORDS: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6), 3 Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) will take the deposition of Defendant Google Inc. 4 (“Google”) on Topics 4-9. The deposition may be recorded by stenographic means, audiotaped, 5 videotaped, and transcribed using real time interactive transcription such as LiveNote. The 6 deposition will commence on a mutually agreeable date(s) and time and continue from day to day 7 until completed. The deposition will take place at the offices of King & Spalding LLP, 333 Twin 8 Dolphin Drive, Suite 400, Redwood Shores, California 94065, or a mutually agreed upon 9 location. 10 INSTRUCTIONS 11 Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Google shall designate 12 one or more of its officers, directors, partners, managing agents, or other persons who consent to 13 testify on Google’s behalf and who are the most knowledgeable with respect to the deposition 14 topics set forth below. At least seven calendar days in advance of the date of deposition, Google 15 is directed to provide to counsel for Oracle a written designation of the name(s) and position(s) of 16 the person(s) designated to testify on the following topic. 17 18 TOPICS 4. Any non-infringing alternatives to the Android technologies alleged to infringe the 19 patents-in-suit and copyrights-in-suit considered by or available to Google from the time Google 20 began to develop Android up to and including the release of version 2.2 (“Froyo”). 21 5. Any changes Google has made or intends to make to Android in response to 22 Oracle’s allegations in this lawsuit or in light of Oracle or Sun Microsystems’ intellectual 23 property rights. 24 6. Android’s security features, including their relation to java.security APIs 25 specification, documentation, and source code and Google’s reasons for making java.security 26 APIs specification, documentation, and source code available to application developers and 27 Android device manufacturers. 28 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6), TOPICS 4-9 CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1470218 EXHIBIT J 1 1 7. Modifications made by third parties to the allegedly-infringing portions of Android 2 identified by Oracle’s copyright and patent infringement contentions, including the author of, date 3 of, and basis for each such modification. 4 8. Google’s business model and marketing strategy for Android. 5 9. Google’s agreements and communications with OEMs and carriers relating to 6 Android, including but not limited to agreements and communications relating to modification of 7 Android source code. 8 9 10 Dated: June 21, 2011 MICHAEL A. JACOBS MARC DAVID PETERS DANIEL P. MUINO MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 11 12 13 14 By: /s/ Daniel P. Muino Daniel P. Muino Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6), TOPICS 4-9 CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1470218 EXHIBIT J 2 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I declare that I am employed with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, whose address is 755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304-1018. I am not a party to the within cause, and I am over the age of eighteen years. 3 4 I further declare that on June 21, 2011, I served a copy of: 5 PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6), TOPICS 4-9 6 7 BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. rule 5(b)] by electronically mailing a true and correct copy through Morrison & Foerster LLP's electronic mail system to the e-mail address(es) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list per agreement in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 5(b). 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Robert F. Perry Scott T. Weingaertner Bruce W. Baber Mark H. Francis Christopher C. Carnaval KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 RPerry@kslaw.com SWeingaertner@kslaw.com bbaber@kslaw.com mfrancis@kslaw.com ccarnaval@kslaw.com 19 Fax: 21 Donald F. Zimmer, Jr. Cheryl Z. Sabnis KING & SPALDING LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105 TScott@kslaw.com GEzgar@kslaw.com LSpooner@kslaw.com Fax: 650.590.1900 Google-Oracle-ServiceOutsideCounsel@kslaw.com 20 Timothy T. Scott Geoffrey M. Ezgar Leo Spooner III KING & SPALDING, LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 22 23 24 25 212.556.2222 Steven Snyder KING & SPALDING LLP 100 N. Tryon Street, Suite 3900 Charlotte, NC 28202 ssnyder@kslaw.com fzimmer@kslaw.com csabnis@kslaw.com Fax: 704.503.2622 Fax: 415.318.1300 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1418284 1 EXHIBIT J 1 Renny F. Hwang GOOGLE INC. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 3 Brian Banner King & Spalding LLP 401 Congress Avenue Suite 3200 Austin, TX 78701 4 bbanner@kslaw.com 5 Fax. 512.457.2100 Ian C. Ballon Heather Meeker GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 1900 University Avenue, 5th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Joseph R. Wetzel Dana K. Powers GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 153 Townsend Street, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94107 ballon@gtlaw.com meekerh@gtlaw.com wetzelj@gtlaw.com powersdk@gtlaw.com 10 Fax: Fax: 415.707.2010 11 Valerie W. Ho GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400E Santa Monica, CA 90404 2 rennyhwang@google.com Fax: 6 7 650.618.1806 8 9 650.328.8508 18 Robert A. Van Nest Christa M. Anderson Michael S. Kwun Daniel Purcell Eugene M. Paige Matthias A. Kamber KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 rvannest@kvn.com canderson@kvn.com mkwun@kvn.com dpurcell@kvn.com epaige@kvn.com mkamber@kvn.com 19 Fax: 415.397.7188 12 13 hov@gtlaw.com 14 Fax: 310.586.7800 15 16 17 20 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. 21 Executed at Palo Alto, California, this 21st day of June, 2011. 22 23 24 25 26 Cynthia D. Fix (typed) /s/ Cynthia D. Fix (signature) 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1418284 2 EXHIBIT J

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?