Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
504
EXHIBITS re #503 Declaration in Support, (Exhibits G through K) filed by Oracle America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit H, #2 Exhibit I, #3 Exhibit J, #4 Exhibit K)(Related document(s) #503 ) (Muino, Daniel) (Filed on 10/7/2011) Modified on 10/11/2011 (wsn, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725)
mdpeters@mofo.com
DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624)
dmuino@mofo.com
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018
Telephone: (650) 813-5600 / Facsimile: (650) 494-0792
6
7
8
9
10
11
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
dboies@bsfllp.com
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: (914) 749-8200 / Facsimile: (914) 749-8300
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177)
sholtzman@bsfllp.com
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 874-1000 / Facsimile: (510) 874-1460
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ORACLE CORPORATION
DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049)
dorian.daley@oracle.com
DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527)
deborah.miller@oracle.com
MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600)
matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 506-5200 / Facsimile: (650) 506-7114
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
23
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
24
Plaintiff,
25
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF
DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT
GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO
FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6), TOPICS 4-9
v.
26
Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA
GOOGLE INC.
27
Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup
Defendant.
28
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6),
TOPICS 4-9 CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1470218
EXHIBIT J
1
TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC., AND TO ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORDS:
2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6),
3
Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) will take the deposition of Defendant Google Inc.
4
(“Google”) on Topics 4-9. The deposition may be recorded by stenographic means, audiotaped,
5
videotaped, and transcribed using real time interactive transcription such as LiveNote. The
6
deposition will commence on a mutually agreeable date(s) and time and continue from day to day
7
until completed. The deposition will take place at the offices of King & Spalding LLP, 333 Twin
8
Dolphin Drive, Suite 400, Redwood Shores, California 94065, or a mutually agreed upon
9
location.
10
INSTRUCTIONS
11
Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Google shall designate
12
one or more of its officers, directors, partners, managing agents, or other persons who consent to
13
testify on Google’s behalf and who are the most knowledgeable with respect to the deposition
14
topics set forth below. At least seven calendar days in advance of the date of deposition, Google
15
is directed to provide to counsel for Oracle a written designation of the name(s) and position(s) of
16
the person(s) designated to testify on the following topic.
17
18
TOPICS
4.
Any non-infringing alternatives to the Android technologies alleged to infringe the
19
patents-in-suit and copyrights-in-suit considered by or available to Google from the time Google
20
began to develop Android up to and including the release of version 2.2 (“Froyo”).
21
5.
Any changes Google has made or intends to make to Android in response to
22
Oracle’s allegations in this lawsuit or in light of Oracle or Sun Microsystems’ intellectual
23
property rights.
24
6.
Android’s security features, including their relation to java.security APIs
25
specification, documentation, and source code and Google’s reasons for making java.security
26
APIs specification, documentation, and source code available to application developers and
27
Android device manufacturers.
28
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6),
TOPICS 4-9 CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1470218
EXHIBIT J
1
1
7.
Modifications made by third parties to the allegedly-infringing portions of Android
2
identified by Oracle’s copyright and patent infringement contentions, including the author of, date
3
of, and basis for each such modification.
4
8.
Google’s business model and marketing strategy for Android.
5
9.
Google’s agreements and communications with OEMs and carriers relating to
6
Android, including but not limited to agreements and communications relating to modification of
7
Android source code.
8
9
10
Dated: June 21, 2011
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MARC DAVID PETERS
DANIEL P. MUINO
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
11
12
13
14
By: /s/ Daniel P. Muino
Daniel P. Muino
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6),
TOPICS 4-9 CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1470218
EXHIBIT J
2
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I declare that I am employed with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, whose address
is 755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304-1018. I am not a party to the within cause,
and I am over the age of eighteen years.
3
4
I further declare that on June 21, 2011, I served a copy of:
5
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT
GOOGLE INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6),
TOPICS 4-9
6
7
BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. rule 5(b)] by electronically
mailing a true and correct copy through Morrison & Foerster LLP's electronic mail
system to the e-mail address(es) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service
list per agreement in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 5(b).
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Robert F. Perry
Scott T. Weingaertner
Bruce W. Baber
Mark H. Francis
Christopher C. Carnaval
KING & SPALDING LLP
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-4003
RPerry@kslaw.com
SWeingaertner@kslaw.com
bbaber@kslaw.com
mfrancis@kslaw.com
ccarnaval@kslaw.com
19
Fax:
21
Donald F. Zimmer, Jr.
Cheryl Z. Sabnis
KING & SPALDING LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
TScott@kslaw.com
GEzgar@kslaw.com
LSpooner@kslaw.com
Fax:
650.590.1900
Google-Oracle-ServiceOutsideCounsel@kslaw.com
20
Timothy T. Scott
Geoffrey M. Ezgar
Leo Spooner III
KING & SPALDING, LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
22
23
24
25
212.556.2222
Steven Snyder
KING & SPALDING LLP
100 N. Tryon Street, Suite 3900
Charlotte, NC 28202
ssnyder@kslaw.com
fzimmer@kslaw.com
csabnis@kslaw.com
Fax:
704.503.2622
Fax: 415.318.1300
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1418284
1
EXHIBIT J
1
Renny F. Hwang
GOOGLE INC.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
3
Brian Banner
King & Spalding LLP
401 Congress Avenue
Suite 3200
Austin, TX 78701
4
bbanner@kslaw.com
5
Fax. 512.457.2100
Ian C. Ballon
Heather Meeker
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
1900 University Avenue, 5th Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Joseph R. Wetzel
Dana K. Powers
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
153 Townsend Street, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94107
ballon@gtlaw.com
meekerh@gtlaw.com
wetzelj@gtlaw.com
powersdk@gtlaw.com
10
Fax:
Fax: 415.707.2010
11
Valerie W. Ho
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400E
Santa Monica, CA 90404
2
rennyhwang@google.com
Fax:
6
7
650.618.1806
8
9
650.328.8508
18
Robert A. Van Nest
Christa M. Anderson
Michael S. Kwun
Daniel Purcell
Eugene M. Paige
Matthias A. Kamber
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
rvannest@kvn.com
canderson@kvn.com
mkwun@kvn.com
dpurcell@kvn.com
epaige@kvn.com
mkamber@kvn.com
19
Fax: 415.397.7188
12
13
hov@gtlaw.com
14
Fax: 310.586.7800
15
16
17
20
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct.
21
Executed at Palo Alto, California, this 21st day of June, 2011.
22
23
24
25
26
Cynthia D. Fix
(typed)
/s/ Cynthia D. Fix
(signature)
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
pa-1418284
2
EXHIBIT J
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?