Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
505
EXHIBITS re #503 Declaration in Support, (Exhibits L through R) filed by Oracle America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit M, #2 Exhibit N, #3 Exhibit O, #4 Exhibit P, #5 Exhibit Q, #6 Exhibit R)(Related document(s) #503 ) (Muino, Daniel) (Filed on 10/7/2011) Modified on 10/11/2011 (wsn, COURT STAFF).
Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
6
Plaintiff,
)
)
7
vs.
)
8
GOOGLE, INC.,
)
9
10
Defendant.
No. CV 10-03561 WHA
)
______________________________)
11
12
13
14
-- HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY--
15
16
17
Videotaped deposition of OWEN ASTRACHAN, PH.D.,
18
taken at King & Spalding, LLP,
19
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood Shores, California,
20
commencing at 9:29 a.m., on
21
Friday, September 9, 2011,
22
before Leslie Rockwood, RPR, CSR No. 3462.
23
24
25
PAGES 1 - 295
Page 1
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
EXHIBIT N
Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
minutes left.
2
MR. KUWAYTI:
3
4
Just a heads up.
Q.
That's about right.
Do you believe that there is creativity in
the choice of the names -- of any of these names?
5
A.
I'm asking -- I'm -- if you're asking in
6
deciding what to name a method, does the designer
7
18:35:30
exercise any creativity?
8
Q.
Yes.
9
A.
And my answer would be even though those
10
names are largely driven by functional concerns, there
11
are certainly choices you can make about whether the name
12
should be length or size or total length.
13
18:35:47
And when you make those choices, it's
14
reasonable to think that you're -- you know, the choice
15
itself has some creativity, but the name itself is
16
functional, but you're making a choice between .size and
17
.length.
18
me that that's creative.
19
really matter which one you choose.
20
would call that a creative choice.
21
Is that creative?
Q.
18:36:09
That's -- it's not clear to
That's a choice, and it doesn't
So I'm not sure I
18:36:31
When you add up the 8,000 choices that went
22
into choosing all these different names and organizing
23
them, would you agree that there's at least minimal
24
creativity involved in that process?
25
MR. BABER:
Object to the form.
18:36:46
Page 288
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
EXHIBIT N
Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
THE WITNESS:
I would not agree that if you
2
add up 8,000 epsilons that you get anything other than
3
epsilons.
4
definition of if there's no -- if there's little to no
5
creativity in each individual one, but somehow that
6
little -- when you add up all the littles, do you get
7
something, and I don't think that you can make that
8
conclusion.
9
Q.
And I'm using, kind of, a mathematical
BY MR. KUWAYTI:
18:36:58
In your opening report at
10
paragraph 62 -- beginning at paragraph 62, you gave some
11
examples of where you believe that Oracle and Sun have
12
implemented various APIs.
13
A.
Yes, I did.
14
Q.
And my question is:
18:37:09
Did you do anything to
15
research whether there was a license to use these APIs by
16
Oracle or Sun?
17
18
19
20
21
A.
No.
Q.
18:37:30
I didn't look to see if there was a
Did you do any research to see whether there
license.
was permission given to Oracle or Sun to use these APIs?
A.
18:37:48
I didn't do research, but I'm reasonably
22
confident that no agreement was made with Visicalc, for
23
example, to include those method names, because I don't
24
think -- from Oracle or Sun, between StarOffice and
25
OpenOffice.
I don't -- I'm assuming they did not talk to
18:38:13
Page 289
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
EXHIBIT N
Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
the originators of Visicalc.
2
That's an assumption.
I
could be wrong.
3
Q.
And you're assuming that why, because --
4
A.
Because I'm thinking that the originators of
5
Visicalc probably aren't around as part of Visicalc.
6
They're certainly around as part of being guys that are
7
still alive.
8
Q.
Right.
9
A.
Correct.
10
Q.
Do you know if in any of these cases was
18:38:25
The company's not around anymore?
11
anybody claiming that these APIs at issue were
12
18:38:36
proprietary?
13
14
A.
I don't know whether there was any -- there
were any such claims, no.
15
Q.
Did you read -- did you do research to
16
determine how much of the API was used, whether it was
17
just the names or whether it was the organizational
18
structure?
19
A.
18:38:47
No.
My report talks about the names, and so
20
I was concentrating on the fact that the names were the
21
same in these two, and I didn't look to see how those
22
names might be organized within the different
23
spreadsheets, because we're talking about the spreadsheet
24
example.
25
Q.
Okay.
So my last question is:
Do you have
18:39:02
18:39:15
Page 290
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
EXHIBIT N
Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
any opinions -- any additional opinions that aren't
2
reflected in your report and that you haven't already
3
discussed here at the deposition today with respect to
4
Dr. Mitchell's reply report?
5
opinions to offer?
6
A.
Are you asking about his last report?
7
Q.
His last report or -- do you have any new
Do you have any additional
18:39:34
8
opinions that aren't reflected in your reports, I guess
9
is my question?
10
A.
No.
I -- no.
I don't think I have new
11
opinions that aren't reflected in my reports, other --
12
new ones.
13
18:39:43
hadn't had, but I don't have any other opinions.
14
15
I mentioned earlier about the names that I
MR. KUWAYTI:
Okay.
I have no further
questions.
18:39:57
16
MR. BABER:
All right.
17
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
I have no questions.
This marks the end of
18
Volume 1, Disk 4, and concludes the deposition of
19
Professor Owen Astrachan.
20
are off the record.
21
MR. BABER:
The time is 6:40 p.m., and we
18:40:09
And on the non-video record, we
22
do reserve our rights to read and sign.
23
rights to read and sign.
24
(TIME NOTED:
25
We exercise our
6:40 p.m.)
---oOo--Page 291
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
EXHIBIT N
EXHIBIT N
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?