Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 64

NOTICE by Google Inc., Oracle America, Inc. Joint Notice Regarding Proposed Protective Orders (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Oracle's proposed protective order, #2 Exhibit B - Google's proposed protective order, #3 Exhibit C - table of disputed provisions)(Peters, Marc) (Filed on 12/10/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 64 Att. 3 Exhibit C Table of Disputed Protective Order Provisions Oracle's Proposal 7.3 Disclosure of "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" and "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE" Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE" only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; (b) Up to five (5) Designated House Counsel of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, who has signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A), and as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a)(1), below, have been followed; Google's Proposal 7.3 Disclosure of "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" and "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE" Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE" only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; (b) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a)(2), below, have been followed; .... [Google's proposal also omits attendant material to Oracle's proposed 7.3(b), such as (c) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) the definition of Designated House Counsel, to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary references to Designated House Counsel for this litigation, (2) who have signed the throughout, and the provision involving "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be objecting to disclosure of Highly Confidential Bound" (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom Attorneys Eyes Only material to Designated House Counsel.] the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a)(2), below, have been followed; .... Dockets.Justia.com Oracle's Proposal [Plaintiff's proposal does not include this provision] 8. Google's Proposal PROSECUTION BAR Absent written consent from the Producing Party, any individual who receives access to "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE" information shall not be involved in the prosecution of patents or patent applications relating to Java, Android, mobile platforms and devices, or virtual machines, including without limitation the patents asserted in this action and any patent or application claiming priority to or otherwise related to the patents asserted in this action, before any foreign or domestic agency, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("the Patent Office"). For purposes of this paragraph, "prosecution" includes directly or indirectly drafting, amending, advising, or otherwise affecting the scope or maintenance of patent claims. To avoid any doubt, "prosecution" as used in this paragraph does not include representing a party challenging a patent before a domestic or foreign agency (including, but not limited to, a reissue protest, ex parte reexamination or inter partes reexamination). This Prosecution Bar shall begin when access to "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE" information is first received by the affected individual and shall end two (2) years after final termination of this action.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?