Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
909
MOTION for Administrative Relief Regarding Statement to Jury filed by Oracle America, Inc.. Responses due by 4/16/2012. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Declaration of Marc Peters)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 4/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725)
mdpeters@mofo.com
DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624)
dmuino@mofo.com
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018
Telephone: (650) 813-5600 / Facsimile: (650) 494-0792
6
7
8
9
10
11
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
dboies@bsfllp.com
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: (914) 749-8200 / Facsimile: (914) 749-8300
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177)
sholtzman@bsfllp.com
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 874-1000 / Facsimile: (510) 874-1460
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ORACLE CORPORATION
DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049)
dorian.daley@oracle.com
DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527)
deborah.miller@oracle.com
MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600)
matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 506-5200 / Facsimile: (650) 506-7114
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
23
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
24
Plaintiff,
25
v.
26
27
28
GOOGLE INC.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ORACLE AMERICA’S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
REGARDING STATEMENT TO JURY
Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup
Defendant.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION RE STATEMENT TO JURY
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
sf- 3132254
1
The Court has read and considered Oracle’s Motion for Administrative Relief Regarding
2
Statement to Jury. Based on the arguments presented in the motion, the pleadings on file, and any
3
other relevant matter, the jury shall be told:
4
The names of the various items appearing in the disputed API package specifications,
such as names of API files, packages, classes, and methods, are not protected.
5
The selection or arrangement of the names of the various items in the API package
specifications may still be protected by copyright if those names are numerous
enough and their selection and arrangement original enough that their combination
constitutes an original work. The Court will instruct the jury on this issue following
the close of evidence.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
13
Date:
Honorable William H. Alsup
Judge of the United States District Court
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION RE STATEMENT TO JURY
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
sf- 3132254
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?