Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 994

PROPOSED CHARGE TO THE JURY AND SPECIAL VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 26, 2012. (Attachments: #1 Draft Special Verdict Form)(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, No. C 10-03561 WHA v. GOOGLE INC., 14 SPECIAL VERDICT FORM Defendant. / 15 16 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 17 1. 18 group: 19 20 As to all the compilable code for the 37 Java API packages in question taken as a A. Has Oracle proven that Google has infringed the overall structure, sequence and organization of a copyrighted work owned by Oracle? 21 Yes __________ No __________ 22 23 (IF YOU ANSWER “NO” TO QUESTION 1A, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION NO. 2.) 24 25 26 27 B. If so, has Google proven that its use of the overall structure, sequence and organization constituted “fair use”? Yes __________ No __________ 28 NOTE: THE 37 API PACKAGES IN QUESTION ARE LISTED IN QUESTION NO. 2. 1 2. 2 As to each of the 37 Java API packages listed below, considered individually: A. Has Oracle proven that Google has infringed the structure, 3 sequence and organization of the compilable code for each individual API 4 package? Please indicate your answer to each in the first column below. 5 B. If, in column 1 your answer is “yes,” then state in the second 6 column whether or not Google has proven that its use constituted “fair use” (as 7 defined in the instructions). If you answered “no” in column 1, you should leave 8 the second column blank or enter “NA” for “not applicable.” 9 C. Has Oracle proven that Google copied the documentation for the individual API package? Please indicate your answer as to each in the third 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 column below. 12 D. If, in column 3, your answer is “yes,” then state in the fourth 13 column whether or not Google has proven that its use constituted “fair use” (as 14 defined in the instructions). If you answered “no” in column 3, you should leave 15 the fourth column blank or enter “NA” for “not applicable.” 16 17 (IN ANSWERING THE FOUR ABOVE SUB-QUESTIONS, PLEASE REMEMBER THE 18 DISTINCTION BETWEEN “COMPILABLE CODE” AND “DOCUMENTATION,” AS DEFINED IN THE 19 INSTRUCTIONS, AS WELL AS THE “WORK AS A WHOLE” ALSO DEFINED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS.) 20 API PACKAGE COMPILABLE CODE API PACKAGE DOCUMENTATION 21 Copying Proven? (Yes or No) Fair Use Proven? (Yes, No or NA) Copying Proven? (Yes or No) Fair Use Proven? Yes, No or NA) java.awt.font __________ __________ __________ __________ java.beans __________ __________ __________ __________ java.io __________ __________ __________ __________ 26 java.lang __________ __________ __________ __________ 27 java.lang.annotation __________ __________ __________ __________ 28 java.lang.ref __________ __________ __________ __________ 22 23 24 25 2 1 API PACKAGE COMPILABLE CODE API PACKAGE DOCUMENTATION 2 Copying Proven? (Yes or No) Fair Use Proven? (Yes, No or NA) Copying Proven? (Yes or No) Fair Use Proven? Yes, No or NA) java.lang.reflect __________ __________ __________ __________ java.net __________ __________ __________ __________ java.nio __________ __________ __________ __________ 7 java.nio.channels __________ __________ __________ __________ 8 java.nio.channels.spi __________ __________ __________ __________ 9 java.nio.charset __________ __________ __________ __________ 10 java.nio.charset.spi __________ __________ __________ __________ 11 java.security __________ __________ __________ __________ java.security.acl __________ __________ __________ __________ java.security.cert __________ __________ __________ __________ java.security.interfaces __________ __________ __________ __________ java.security.spec __________ __________ __________ __________ 15 java.sql __________ __________ __________ __________ 16 java.text __________ __________ __________ __________ 17 java.util __________ __________ __________ __________ 18 java.util.jar __________ __________ __________ __________ 19 java.util.logging __________ __________ __________ __________ java.util.prefs __________ __________ __________ __________ java.util.regex __________ __________ __________ __________ java.util.zip __________ __________ __________ __________ 22 javax.crypto __________ __________ __________ __________ 23 javax.crypto.interfaces __________ __________ __________ __________ 24 javax.crypto.spec __________ __________ __________ __________ 25 javax.net __________ __________ __________ __________ 26 javax.net.ssl __________ __________ __________ __________ javax.security.auth __________ __________ __________ __________ javax.security.auth.callback __________ __________ __________ __________ javax.security.auth.login __________ __________ __________ __________ 3 4 5 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 6 12 13 14 20 21 27 28 3 1 API PACKAGE COMPILABLE CODE API PACKAGE DOCUMENTATION 2 Copying Proven? (Yes or No) Fair Use Proven? (Yes, No or NA) Copying Proven? (Yes or No) Fair Use Proven? Yes, No or NA) javax.security.auth.x500 __________ __________ __________ __________ javax.security.cert __________ __________ __________ __________ javax.sql __________ __________ __________ __________ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3. Has Google proven that its conceded use in Android of the following items was de minimis: Yes No 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 A. The rangeCheck method in TimSort.java and ComparableTimSort.Java _______ _______ B. Source code in eight “Impl.java files _______ _______ C. The English-language comments in CodeSourceTest.java and CollectionCertStoreParametriums Test.java _______ _______ 17 18 19 20 4. If you found in Questions 1, 2 or 3 that Google copied Oracle’s works and that the copying was not excused by fair use or de minimis, then answer the following questions: A. Has Oracle proven that third-party mobile device manufacturers 21 namely, _______________, _______________, _______________, 22 _______________, _______________ infringed Oracle’s copyrights by copying 23 or using Android software? 24 B. If you answered “yes” to 4(A), has Oracle proven that Google 25 intentionally induced or materially contributed to the third-party infringement you 26 found in Question No. 4(A)? 27 28 4 1 C. If you answered “yes” to 4(A), has Oracle proven that Google 2 vicariously infringed Oracle’s copyrights as a result of the third-party 3 infringement you found in Question No. 4(A)? 4 5 6 7 8 9 ____________________________________ FOREPERSON 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Dated: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?