Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
994
PROPOSED CHARGE TO THE JURY AND SPECIAL VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 26, 2012. (Attachments: #1 Draft Special Verdict Form)(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. C 10-03561 WHA
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
14
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
Defendant.
/
15
16
YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS.
17
1.
18
group:
19
20
As to all the compilable code for the 37 Java API packages in question taken as a
A.
Has Oracle proven that Google has infringed the overall structure,
sequence and organization of a copyrighted work owned by Oracle?
21
Yes __________
No __________
22
23
(IF YOU ANSWER “NO” TO QUESTION 1A, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION NO. 2.)
24
25
26
27
B.
If so, has Google proven that its use of the overall structure,
sequence and organization constituted “fair use”?
Yes __________
No __________
28
NOTE: THE 37 API PACKAGES IN QUESTION ARE LISTED IN QUESTION NO. 2.
1
2.
2
As to each of the 37 Java API packages listed below, considered individually:
A.
Has Oracle proven that Google has infringed the structure,
3
sequence and organization of the compilable code for each individual API
4
package? Please indicate your answer to each in the first column below.
5
B.
If, in column 1 your answer is “yes,” then state in the second
6
column whether or not Google has proven that its use constituted “fair use” (as
7
defined in the instructions). If you answered “no” in column 1, you should leave
8
the second column blank or enter “NA” for “not applicable.”
9
C.
Has Oracle proven that Google copied the documentation for the
individual API package? Please indicate your answer as to each in the third
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
column below.
12
D.
If, in column 3, your answer is “yes,” then state in the fourth
13
column whether or not Google has proven that its use constituted “fair use” (as
14
defined in the instructions). If you answered “no” in column 3, you should leave
15
the fourth column blank or enter “NA” for “not applicable.”
16
17
(IN ANSWERING THE FOUR ABOVE SUB-QUESTIONS, PLEASE REMEMBER THE
18
DISTINCTION BETWEEN “COMPILABLE CODE” AND “DOCUMENTATION,” AS DEFINED IN THE
19
INSTRUCTIONS, AS WELL AS THE “WORK AS A WHOLE” ALSO DEFINED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS.)
20
API PACKAGE
COMPILABLE CODE
API PACKAGE
DOCUMENTATION
21
Copying
Proven?
(Yes or No)
Fair Use
Proven?
(Yes, No or NA)
Copying
Proven?
(Yes or No)
Fair Use
Proven?
Yes, No or NA)
java.awt.font
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.beans
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.io
__________
__________
__________
__________
26
java.lang
__________
__________
__________
__________
27
java.lang.annotation
__________
__________
__________
__________
28
java.lang.ref
__________
__________
__________
__________
22
23
24
25
2
1
API PACKAGE
COMPILABLE CODE
API PACKAGE
DOCUMENTATION
2
Copying
Proven?
(Yes or No)
Fair Use
Proven?
(Yes, No or NA)
Copying
Proven?
(Yes or No)
Fair Use
Proven?
Yes, No or NA)
java.lang.reflect
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.net
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.nio
__________
__________
__________
__________
7
java.nio.channels
__________
__________
__________
__________
8
java.nio.channels.spi
__________
__________
__________
__________
9
java.nio.charset
__________
__________
__________
__________
10
java.nio.charset.spi
__________
__________
__________
__________
11
java.security
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.security.acl
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.security.cert
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.security.interfaces
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.security.spec
__________
__________
__________
__________
15
java.sql
__________
__________
__________
__________
16
java.text
__________
__________
__________
__________
17
java.util
__________
__________
__________
__________
18
java.util.jar
__________
__________
__________
__________
19
java.util.logging
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.util.prefs
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.util.regex
__________
__________
__________
__________
java.util.zip
__________
__________
__________
__________
22
javax.crypto
__________
__________
__________
__________
23
javax.crypto.interfaces
__________
__________
__________
__________
24
javax.crypto.spec
__________
__________
__________
__________
25
javax.net
__________
__________
__________
__________
26
javax.net.ssl
__________
__________
__________
__________
javax.security.auth
__________
__________
__________
__________
javax.security.auth.callback
__________
__________
__________
__________
javax.security.auth.login
__________
__________
__________
__________
3
4
5
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
6
12
13
14
20
21
27
28
3
1
API PACKAGE
COMPILABLE CODE
API PACKAGE
DOCUMENTATION
2
Copying
Proven?
(Yes or No)
Fair Use
Proven?
(Yes, No or NA)
Copying
Proven?
(Yes or No)
Fair Use
Proven?
Yes, No or NA)
javax.security.auth.x500
__________
__________
__________
__________
javax.security.cert
__________
__________
__________
__________
javax.sql
__________
__________
__________
__________
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3.
Has Google proven that its conceded use in Android of the following items was
de minimis:
Yes
No
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
A. The rangeCheck method in
TimSort.java and
ComparableTimSort.Java
_______
_______
B. Source code in eight “Impl.java
files
_______
_______
C. The English-language comments in
CodeSourceTest.java and
CollectionCertStoreParametriums
Test.java
_______
_______
17
18
19
20
4.
If you found in Questions 1, 2 or 3 that Google copied Oracle’s works and that the
copying was not excused by fair use or de minimis, then answer the following questions:
A.
Has Oracle proven that third-party mobile device manufacturers
21
namely, _______________, _______________, _______________,
22
_______________, _______________ infringed Oracle’s copyrights by copying
23
or using Android software?
24
B.
If you answered “yes” to 4(A), has Oracle proven that Google
25
intentionally induced or materially contributed to the third-party infringement you
26
found in Question No. 4(A)?
27
28
4
1
C.
If you answered “yes” to 4(A), has Oracle proven that Google
2
vicariously infringed Oracle’s copyrights as a result of the third-party
3
infringement you found in Question No. 4(A)?
4
5
6
7
8
9
____________________________________
FOREPERSON
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Dated:
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?