Jackson v. Lewis
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/15/11. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2011)
<![CDATA[
Jackson v. Lewis
Doc. 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
No. C 10-5488 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
*E-Filed 3/15/11*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ANDRE V. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. G. D. LEWIS, Defendant. /
No. C 10-5488 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This is a civil rights action filed by a pro se state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The original complaint was dismissed owing to plaintiff's failure to file a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). The action was reopened when plaintiff completed his IFP application, and the complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff was granted an additional 30 days at his request. The due date for the amended complaint has passed, and plaintiff has not filed such a document. Plaintiff has filed a motion to reopen the action (Docket No. 10) in which he vaguely describes some complaints, but it is entirely lacking specific factual allegations from which claims remediable under § 1983 can be construed. Accordingly, the action is hereby DISMISSED. Plaintiff's motion to reopen the action is DENIED as moot, on grounds that the action was
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
open when he filed his motion. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Petitioner has not shown "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, terminate Docket No. 10, and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 15, 2011 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge
2
No. C 10-5488 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
