Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filing
71
NOTICE OF REFERRAL AND ORDER re: discovery procedures. The court denies without prejudice 68 Plaintiff's motion for a protective order and vacates the current 12/29/2011 hearing date. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order) (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
OAKLAND DIVISION
4
STANDING ORDER FOR
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER
(Effective July 29, 2011)
5
local rules, the general orders, this standing order, and the Northern District’s general standing order
8
for civil cases titled “Contents of Joint Case Management Statement.” Local rules, general orders,
9
general standing orders, and a summary of the general orders’ electronic filing requirements (including
10
the procedures for emailing proposed orders to chambers) are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov
11
For the Northern District of California
Parties shall comply with the procedures in the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure, the
7
United States District Court
6
(click “Rules” or “ECF-PACER”). The parties’ failure to comply with any of the rules and orders may
12
be a ground for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of judgment, or other appropriate sanctions.
13
A. CALENDAR DATES AND SCHEDULING
14
1. The criminal motions calendar is on the first and third Thursdays of the month at 9:30 a.m. The
15
civil motions calendar is on the first and third Thursdays of the month at 11 a.m. Civil case management
16
conferences are Thursdays at 10:30 a.m. and are not recorded unless a party is pro se or unless counsel
17
requests recording.
18
2. Parties who notice motions under the local rules need not reserve a hearing date in advance if
19
the
20
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov). Depending on its schedule, the Court may reset or vacate hearings.
21
22
date
is
available
on
the
Court’s
on-line
calendar
(click
“Calendars”
at
3. For scheduling questions, please call Judge Beeler’s courtroom deputy, Lashanda Scott, at (510)
637-3525.
23
B. CHAMBERS COPIES
24
4. Under Civil Local Rule 5-1(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of any filing and mark
25
it as a copy for “Chambers.” Please three-hole punch the chambers copy.
26
27
28
STANDING ORDER FOR UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER
1
C. CIVIL DISCOVERY
2
5. Evidence Preservation. After a party has notice of this order, it shall take the steps needed to
3
preserve information relevant to the issues in this action, including suspending any document destruction
4
programs (including destruction programs for electronically-maintained material).
5
6. Production of Documents In Original Form. When searching for documents and material
6
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) or after a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a) request,
7
parties (a) should search all locations – electronic and otherwise – where responsive materials might
8
plausibly exist, and (b) to the maximum extent feasible, produce or make available for copying and/or
9
inspection the materials in their original form, sequence, and organization (including, for example, file
folders).
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
7. Privilege Logs. If a party withholds material as privileged, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5) and
12
45(d)(2)(A), it must produce a privilege log as quickly as possible, but no later than fourteen days after
13
its disclosures or discovery responses are due, unless the parties stipulate to or the Court sets another
14
date. Privilege logs must contain the following: (a) the subject matter or general nature of the document
15
(without disclosing its contents); (b) the identity and position of its author; (c) the date it was
16
communicated; (d) the identity and position of all addressees and recipients of the communication;
17
(e) the document’s present location; (f) the specific privilege and a brief summary of any supporting
18
facts; and (g) the steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the communication, including an
19
affirmation that no unauthorized persons received the communication.
20
8. Expedited Procedures for Discovery Disputes. The parties shall not file formal discovery
21
motions. Instead, and as required by the federal rules and local rules, the parties shall meet and confer
22
to try to resolve their disagreements. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1); Civil L. R. 37-1. After attempting
23
other means of conferring such as letters, phone calls, or emails, lead counsel for the parties must meet
24
and confer in person. (If counsel are located outside of the Bay Area and cannot confer in person, lead
25
counsel may meet and confer by telephone.) Either party may demand such a meeting with ten days'
26
notice. If the parties cannot agree on the location, the location for meetings shall alternate. Plaintiff's
27
counsel shall select the first location, defense counsel shall select the second location, and so forth. If
28
the parties do not resolve their disagreements through this procedure, the parties shall file a joint letter
STANDING ORDER FOR UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER
2
1
of no more than five pages instead of a formal motion five days after lead counsels' in-person meet-
2
and-confer. Lead counsel for both parties must sign the letter and attest that they met and conferred in
3
person. The joint letter shall set out each issue in a separate section and include in that section each
4
parties’ position (with appropriate legal authority) and proposed compromise. (This process allows a
5
side-by-side analysis of each disputed issue.) If the disagreement concerns specific discovery that a
6
party has propounded, such as interrogatories, requests for production of documents, or answers or
7
objections to such discovery, the parties shall reproduce the question/request and the response in its
8
entirety in the letter. The Court then will review the letter and determine whether future proceedings
9
are necessary. In emergencies during discovery events such as depositions, the parties may contact the
Court pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-1(b).
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
D. CONSENT CASES
12
9. In cases that are randomly assigned to Judge Beeler for all purposes, the parties should file their
13
written consent to the assignment of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes, or their written
14
declination of consent, as soon as possible. If a party files a dispositive motion (such as a motion to
15
dismiss or a motion for remand), the moving party must file the consent or declination simultaneously
16
with the motion. Similarly, the party opposing the motion must file the consent or declination
17
simultaneously with the opposition.
18
E. SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
19
Motions for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a joint statement of the material facts that
20
the parties agree are not in dispute. The joint statement shall include – for each undisputed fact –
21
citations to admissible evidence. The parties shall comply with the procedures set forth in Civil Local
22
Rule 56-1(b). The parties may not file – and the Court will not consider – separate statements of
23
undisputed facts. Failure to stipulate to an undisputed fact without a reasonable basis for doing so may
24
result in sanctions. See Civil L. R. 56-1(b).
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
STANDING ORDER FOR UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREL BEELER
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?