Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al

Filing 43

MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Michael D. Almy, Jason D. Knight, Anthony J. Loverde. Motion Hearing set for 9/1/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Responses due by 8/10/2011. Replies due by 8/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration by Almy, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Almy Dec, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Almy Dec, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Almy Dec, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Almy Dec, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Almy Dec, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Almy Dec, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Almy Dec, # 9 Exhibit 8 to Almy Dec, # 10 Exhibit 9 to Almy Dec, # 11 Exhibit 10 to Almy Dec, # 12 Declaration by Knight, # 13 Exhibit 1 to Knight Dec, # 14 Exhibit 2 to Knight Dec, # 15 Exhibit 3 to Knight Dec, # 16 Exhibit 4 to Knight Dec, # 17 Exhibit 5 to Knight Dec, # 18 Exhibit 6 to Knight Dec, # 19 Exhibit 7 to Knight Dec, # 20 Declaration by Loverde, # 21 Exhibit 1 to Loverde Dec, # 22 Exhibit 2 to Loverde Dec, # 23 Exhibit 3 to Loverde Dec, # 24 Exhibit 4 to Loverde Dec, # 25 Exhibit 5 to Loverde Dec, # 26 Exhibit 6 to Loverde Dec, # 27 Exhibit 7 to Loverde Dec, # 28 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Woodmansee, Mark) (Filed on 7/27/2011) Modified on 8/4/2011 (gba, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE (CA SBN 201780) MAWoodmansee@mofo.com STEPHANIE L. FONG (CA SBN 240836) SFong@mofo.com KIMBERLY R. GOSLING (CA SBN 247803) KGosling@mofo.com JESSICA A. ROBERTS (CA SBN 265570) JRoberts@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 12531 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 92130-2040 Telephone: 858.720.5100 Facsimile: 858.720.5125 JOHN M. GOODMAN (DC SBN 383147) jgoodman@sldn.org SERVICEMEMBERS LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK P.O. Box 65301 Washington, DC 20035-5301 Telephone: 202.328.3244 Facsimile: 202.797.1635 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL D. ALMY, JASON D. KNIGHT, AND ANTHONY J. LOVERDE 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 MICHAEL D. ALMY, JASON D. KNIGHT, and ANTHONY J. LOVERDE, Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense; DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary, Department of the Air Force; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; and RAY MABUS, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. LOVERDE sd-544699 Case No. 10-cv-05627-RS DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. LOVERDE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date: September 1, 2011 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 3, 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg 1 I, Anthony J. Loverde, hereby declare as follows: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Since childhood, I had an interest in serving in the U.S. military. One of my grandfathers served in the Coast Guard in World War II, another grandfather served in the Army during the Korean conflict and received a Purple Heart, and one of my uncles served in the Marine Corps in Vietnam. I was the first member of my family in this generation to serve in the armed forces. I was followed by my brother and three of my cousins. My brother served in the Army as an Infantryman and currently serves in the Air Force Reserves as a Security Forces Non-Commissioned Officer. 2. I enlisted in the Air Force in February 2001. I served from 2001 to 2004 in the 86th Maintenance Squadron. During this time, I was stationed in Germany and calibrated weapons systems for the squadron as a Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory Technician. In 2005, I was reassigned to Edwards Air Force Base, California. 3. Although I had the option of leaving the Air Force in 2007, after quite a bit of encouragement from those I served under, I decided to reenlist in 2006 before my original enlistment ended. At that time, I opted to retrain as a C-130 Loadmaster. In this new role, I joined the 37th Airlift Squadron at Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany. In 2007, I deployed with my squadron as part of the troop “surge” in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. 4. During my service in the Air Force, I received numerous military awards and decorations. These accolades include, but are not limited to, the Air Medal, the Air Force Commendation Medal, the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, the Air Force Overseas Ribbon, the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon, the Air Force Longevity Service Ribbon, the Air Force NCO PME Graduate Ribbon, the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon, and the Air Force Training Ribbon. 5. During my service in the Air Force, my military superiors and evaluators provided uniformly high assessments of me in my annual performance evaluations and promotion recommendations. For example, one former supervisor made the following comment: DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. LOVERDE sd-544699 1 1 Unmatched support on channel [mission] . . . key to mission success . . . superior knowledge/abilities guaranteed readiness . . . pressing ahead of peers academically . . . agile in body & mind[.] Earned Distinguished Graduate award from Basic Loadmaster course . . . Hard charger . . . Airdropped 87 Army & Italian special forces; critical to joint training exercise—fostered combat effectiveness . . . Sincere humanitarian; visited injured soldiers at LRMC w/Red Cross pet program—lifted hopes/sped recovery[.] Excels in all facets of his duties, consistently improving knowledge level and loadmaster skills—promote now. 2 3 4 5 6 A copy of this performance review is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 7 6. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 However, during my deployment to Ali Al Salem Air Force Base in 2007, it became clear to me that I could no longer continue pretending to be someone I was not. Other service members talked about loved ones back home and leaned on each other for support, but because I am gay, I found myself avoiding interaction with my fellow troops so as not to deceive them. 7. Upon my return from deployment in April 2008, I emailed two of my superior officers to let them know that I am gay. I was mindful of what the Air Force has described as “Air Force Core Values,” which are “Integrity first, Service before self, and Excellence in all we do.” I told my superior officers that although I would like to continue to serve, I could not do so if it also meant continuing to conceal my sexual orientation. A true and correct copy of the email I sent to MSgt Welch is attached as Exhibit 2. 8. On or about April 24, 2008, MSgt Welch telephoned me to request a meeting with him and Lt. Col. Brian Yates, my commander, to discuss my email sent April 22, 2008. The following day, my commander asked me to acknowledge the printed email dated April 22, 2008 and to confirm that I sent the email and was not coerced to do so. The commander informed me that I was the first Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell case that he had to deal with, and that he did not know what to do about it. The commander said he would contact the Air Force legal department for further instruction and his official recommendation would be made according to the legal department’s recommendation. 9. The following day, April 25, 2008, my commander informed me that the legal department recommended discharge. He again let me know that he did not know what to expect DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. LOVERDE sd-544699 2 1 in regards to the process, but that I should check in periodically with the First Sergeant to find out 2 any information that may come available. My commander and First Sergeant then ordered me to 3 resume my two weeks of reintegration leave that was granted to all returning aircrew members 4 from deployment and to report back to work at the end of my leave. 5 6 10. department regarding the April 22, 2008 email and stated: 7 It is not my opinion that SSgt Loverde made this statement for the sole purpose of avoiding military service. He recently returned from a four-month deployment, so the timing of this statement is not suspect. In addition, SSgt Loverde showed interest in finishing out his enlistment. SSgt Loverde’s military record and performance has been nothing less than honorable. 8 9 10 11 12 On May 13, 2008, my commander filed an official memorandum with the legal A copy of this memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 11. On or about June 9, 2008, I received a memorandum informing me that I was 13 being recommended for discharge under DADT. A true and correct copy of this memorandum is 14 attached hereto as Exhibit 4. The memo stated: 15 I am recommending that you receive an honorable discharge characterization. The commander exercising Special Court-Martial Convening Authority jurisdiction, or a higher authority, will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the United States Air Force. 16 17 18 12. I was concerned that it was nearly impossible to win retention with a board 19 hearing, and it would only delay the process and discharge would ultimately result in the end. 20 Moreover, I feared that, although my commander had recommended an honorable discharge, the 21 higher authority might change the categorization due to some sort of prejudice. 22 13. I am aware of personal prejudice towards homosexuality, and I did not want to risk 23 my honorable characterization for anything less than what my service record reflected. I asked to 24 be retained, but if that was not possible, my service record reflected an honorable characterization 25 and there was no protection from prejudice in the administrative process. The waiver was the 26 only assurance to protect myself from further discrimination under the law. 27 28 DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. LOVERDE sd-544699 3 1 14. In support of my request for retention, I cited the Witt v. Department of the Air 2 Force decision, which had been made on May 21, 2008. I also provided numerous character 3 references to support the fact that my discharge would not meet the “heightened standard” 4 required by Witt. A true and correct copy of an email in which I made clear to my commanders 5 that I did not want to be discharged, and that I thought the Witt standard should apply, is attached 6 hereto as Exhibit 5. 7 15. During the discharge process, many other co-workers and superiors wrote in 8 support of my retention. Consistent with my high performance reviews throughout my career, 9 these supporters noted that I “always produced high quality work” and could be counted on “to 10 get the job done right.” Based on his personal experience working with me, one former superior 11 officer wrote: “I fully recommend that you consider retaining him in the Air Force. He has the 12 potential to go very far in whatever endeavor he pursues . . . I hope that includes continued 13 service to our nation.” Another former superior officer wrote: “If I ever had the opportunity to 14 build my ‘dream team’ for work, I would take an entire crew of SSgt Loverdes over most other 15 workers I have encountered.” 16 16. Nonetheless, on or about June 19, 2008, I received a “Discharge Legal Review” 17 memorandum again recommending discharge. A true and correct copy of the “Discharge Legal 18 Review” memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit 6. The memorandum recommended an 19 honorable discharge. It cited the basis for this action as the email I sent to my superiors in April. 20 The memorandum recognized that I wanted the Witt standard to be applied to my case, but 21 dismissed this standard as inapplicable. 22 17. In face of the discharge recommendation, on June 24, 2008, the Air Force Career 23 Enhancement office notified me that I was eligible and scheduled for promotion testing on June 24 25, 2008. I tested for promotion although I was in the process of being kicked out of the Air 25 Force. 26 18. Ironically, in August 2008, I was awarded the Air Medal for my “superior ability 27 in the presence of perilous conditions” during my deployment in support of Operation Iraqi 28 Freedom—the deployment that ultimately brought me to the decision to come out as gay to the DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. LOVERDE sd-544699 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?