Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al

Filing 70

MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Michael D. Almy. Motion Hearing set for 8/9/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Responses due by 7/19/2012. Replies due by 7/26/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Almy, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Proposed Order)(Woodmansee, Mark) (Filed on 7/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL D. ALMY, JASON D. KNIGHT, and ANTHONY J. LOVERDE, Plaintiffs, 12 15 16 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 13 14 Case No. 10-cv-05627-RS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense; DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary, Department of the Air Force; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; and RAY MABUS, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Date: August 9, 2012 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 3, 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Defendants. 18 19 This matter coming before the Court on Plaintiff Almy’s Motion for Partial Summary 20 Judgment, the Court, having considered the papers, all the record evidence and arguments of 21 counsel, finds Plaintiff’s discharge proceedings and subsequent discharge violated his substantive 22 due process rights. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT sd-593903 1 1 THEREFORE, 2 Plaintiff Almy’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the 3 Defendants shall reinstate Plaintiff on active duty in the U.S. Air Force within 30 days. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: Hon. Richard Seeborg U.S. District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT sd-593903 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?