Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
Filing
78
Joint MOTION to Stay Current Briefing Schedule and to Create Briefing Schedule on Motion for Protective Order filed by Michael D. Almy. Responses due by 8/23/2012. Replies due by 8/30/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Jessica Roberts)(Roberts, Jessica) (Filed on 8/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE (CA SBN 201780)
MAWoodmansee@mofo.com
STEPHANIE L. FONG (CA SBN 240836)
SFong@mofo.com
KIMBERLY R. GOSLING (CA SBN 247803)
KGosling@mofo.com
JESSICA A. ROBERTS (CA SBN 265570)
JRoberts@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
12531 High Bluff Drive
San Diego, California 92130-2040
Telephone: 858.720.5100
Facsimile: 858.720.5125
JOHN M. GOODMAN (DC SBN 383147)
jgoodman@sldn.org
SERVICEMEMBERS LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK
P. O. Box 65301
Washington, DC 20035-5301
Telephone: 202.328.3244
Facsimile: 202.797.1635
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL D. ALMY
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
MICHAEL ALMY, JASON KNIGHT, and
ANTHONY LOVERDE,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE; ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary
of Defense; DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR
FORCE; MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary,
Department of the Air Force; DEPARTMENT
OF THE NAVY; and RAY MABUS,
Secretary, Department of the Navy,
Case No. cv 10-5627 (RS)
STIPULATED JOINT
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR STAY OF
CURRENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE
AND TO CREATE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
sd-597782
1
In accordance with Northern District of California Local Rules 6-2, 7-11 and 7-12
2
plaintiff Michael Almy and the Government Defendants, by and through their respective counsel,
3
file this stipulated joint administrative motion for a stay of the current briefing schedule and to
4
create a briefing schedule on a motion for a protective order.
5
On August 10, 2012, Defendants in this matter are scheduled to file their Opposition to
6
Plaintiff Almy’s Motion for Summary Judgment and their own Motion to Dismiss, or in the
7
alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants have indicated that they intend to attach
8
documents and quote from documents that Plaintiff believes should be filed under seal.
9
Defendants disagree with Plaintiff’s assessment of the confidentiality of these materials and,
10
pursuant to Federal Regulation 29 CFR 50.9, believe that it is appropriate to file them on the
11
public record.
12
13
The parties have met and conferred on this issue and have reached the following
agreement, subject to the Court’s approval:
14
15
that the briefing schedule set out in ECF No. 77 be stayed pending resolution of a
protective order regarding the material at issue;
16
17
that Plaintiff files a Motion for Protective Order no later than August 24, 2012,
which shall be noticed for October 4, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.;
18
19
that Defendant files an Opposition to the Motion for Protective Order no later than
September 7, 2012;
20
21
that Plaintiff files a Reply to the Motion for Protective Order no later than
September 14, 2012.
22
Due to the dispute over the nature of the materials, the briefing on the Protective Order
23
shall be filed under seal pending resolution by the Court. To the extent the Court deems the
24
material at issue not to be “sealable,” the briefing regarding the Motion for Protective Order shall
25
become public five (5) business days after the Court’s ruling on the Motion for Protective Order.
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATED JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
sd-597782
1
1
Also, five (5) business days following the Court’s ruling on the Motion for Protective
2
Order, the briefing for Plaintiff s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Motion to
3
Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment shall resume pursuant to a revised
4
briefing schedule ordered by the Court.
5
6
Dated: August 9, 2012
7
8
9
M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE
STEPHANIE L. FONG
KIMBERLY R. GOSLING
JESSICA ANNE ROBERTS
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
JOHN M. GOODMAN
SERVICEMEMBERS LEGAL DEFENSE
NETWORK
10
11
12
By: /s/ M. Andrew Woodmansee
M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL ALMY
14
15
16
17
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated:
United States District Court Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
sd-597782
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?