Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al

Filing 93

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Proceedings filed by Michael D. Almy. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of M. Andrew Woodmansee, # 2 Proposed Order)(Woodmansee, Mark) (Filed on 10/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE (CA SBN 201780) MAWoodmansee@mofo.com STEPHANIE L. FONG (CA SBN 240836) SFong@mofo.com KIMBERLY R. GOSLING (CA SBN 247803) KGosling@mofo.com JESSICA A. ROBERTS (CA SBN 265570) JRoberts@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 12531 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 92130-2040 Telephone: 858.720.5100 Facsimile: 858.720.5125 JOHN M. GOODMAN (DC SBN 383147) jgoodman@sldn.org SERVICEMEMBERS LEGAL DEFENSE NETWORK P. O. Box 65301 Washington, DC 20035-5301 Telephone: 202.328.3244 Facsimile: 202.797.1635 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL D. ALMY 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 MICHAEL ALMY, JASON KNIGHT, and ANTHONY LOVERDE, 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. cv 10-5627 (RS) DECLARATION OF M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense; DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary, Department of the Air Force; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; and RAY MABUS, Secretary, Department of the Navy, 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE ISO STIP. TO STAY PROCEEDINGS sd-602149 1 I, M. Andrew Woodmansee, hereby declare as follows: 2 1. I am a member of the bar of the State of California. I am a partner with the law 3 firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for plaintiff Michael D. Almy. I have personal 4 knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and if called upon to do so, I could and would testify 5 competently thereto. 6 2. On July 5, 2012, Plaintiff Almy filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 7 (ECF No. 70.) The briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment has 8 been continued twice and is currently stayed pending the outcome of Plaintiff’s Motion for a 9 Protective Order. (See ECF No. 74, 77, and 79.) 10 3. On August 24, 2012, Plaintiff Almy filed a Motion for Protective Order under seal. 11 Defendants filed an opposition under seal on September 7, 2012, and Plaintiff filed a reply under 12 seal on September 14, 2012. The briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order has 13 been continued twice and was most recently set to be heard by this Court on October 15, 2012, at 14 1:30 p.m. (ECF No. 86 and 89.) On October 10, 2012, the Court vacated the October 15 hearing 15 and the motion was submitted without oral argument. (ECF No. 90.) 16 17 4. The proposed stay is agreed to by both sides and would continue pending the completion of the parties’ attempts to achieve a resolution outside this matter. 18 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 19 Executed on October 11, 2012, at San Diego, California. 20 21 By: /s/ M. Andrew Woodmansee M. Andrew Woodmansee MAWoodmansee@mofo.com 22 23 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael D. Almy 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE ISO STIP. TO STAY PROCEEDINGS sd-602149 1 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic service, are being served this 11th day of October, 2012, with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 5 6 /s/ M. Andrew Woodmansee M. Andrew Woodmansee 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF M. ANDREW WOODMANSEE ISO STIP. TO STAY PROCEEDINGS sd-602149 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?