New Sensations, Inc v. Does 1-1745
Filing
31
ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 24, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/24/2011: #1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
NEW SENSATIONS, INC, a California
corporation,
9
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 10-05863 WHA
ORDER REGARDING
MOTION PRACTICE
v.
DOES 1–1745,
Defendants.
/
13
14
A large-scale criminal trial before the undersigned judge is underway and is expected to
15
conclude during the late summer or early fall. Because this trial consumes an unusual amount of
16
time and resources, motions in civil cases will be considered and heard only on a selective basis.
17
Except for discovery disputes, no motions may be filed in this action without prior written
18
approval. A party seeking approval to file a motion must file a précis that summarizes the
19
essence of the motion and explains its urgency. Any party opposing approval to file based on the
20
précis may file an opposition by noon on the second business day following the day on which the
21
précis was filed. Both the précis and the opposition must be three double-spaced pages or shorter
22
and may not contain footnotes or attachments. After considering the précis and the opposition (if
23
any), the Court will either grant or deny leave to file the motion. If leave is granted, a briefing
24
schedule and hearing date will be set.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: June 24, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?