New Sensations, Inc v. Does 1-1745

Filing 31

ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 24, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/24/2011: #1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 NEW SENSATIONS, INC, a California corporation, 9 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-05863 WHA ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE v. DOES 1–1745, Defendants. / 13 14 A large-scale criminal trial before the undersigned judge is underway and is expected to 15 conclude during the late summer or early fall. Because this trial consumes an unusual amount of 16 time and resources, motions in civil cases will be considered and heard only on a selective basis. 17 Except for discovery disputes, no motions may be filed in this action without prior written 18 approval. A party seeking approval to file a motion must file a précis that summarizes the 19 essence of the motion and explains its urgency. Any party opposing approval to file based on the 20 précis may file an opposition by noon on the second business day following the day on which the 21 précis was filed. Both the précis and the opposition must be three double-spaced pages or shorter 22 and may not contain footnotes or attachments. After considering the précis and the opposition (if 23 any), the Court will either grant or deny leave to file the motion. If leave is granted, a briefing 24 schedule and hearing date will be set. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: June 24, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?