Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC v. Hotz et al
Filing
112
OBJECTIONS to re 105 Declaration in Opposition, 104 Declaration in Opposition,,, 107 Declaration in Opposition, Objections to Bricker Declaration by George Hotz. (Attachments: # 1 Objections to Law Dec, # 2 Objections to Liu Dec, # 3 Objections to Miller Dec, # 4 Objections to Pierce Dec)(Kellar, Stewart) (Filed on 3/25/2011)
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC v. Hotz et al
Doc. 112 Att. 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STEWART KELLAR (SBN 267747) stewart@etrny.com E-ttorney at Law 148 Townsend Street, Suite 2 San Francisco, California 94107 Telephone: (415) 742-2303 JACK C. PRAETZELLIS (SBN 267765) jack@mbvlaw.com MBV LAW LLP 855 Front Street San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 781-4400 Facsimile: (415) 989-5143 YASHA HEIDARI (Pro Hac Vice) heidari@heidariplank.com HEIDARI POWER LAW GROUP LLC Post Office Box 79217 Atlanta, Georgia 30357 Telephone: (404) 518-6668 Facsimile: (404) 601-7852 Attorneys for Defendant George Hotz UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE HOTZ, et al., Defendants.
Case No. 11-cv-000167 SI DEFENDANT GEORGE HOTZ'S OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF JENNIFER LIU IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY CONTAINED THEREIN Date: Time: Place: April 8, 2011 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 10, 19th Floor
Defendant George Hotz objects to the following paragraphs of Jennifer Lui's declaration in support of plaintiff's opposition to Mr. Hotz's motion to dismiss. Moreover, Ms. Lui's Declaration was late filed. SCEA must play by the rules, just like all other litigants. Opposition to
OBJECTIONS TO LIU DECLARATION (No. 11-CV-00167-SI) Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Mr. Hotz' Motion to Dismiss was due on March 18, 2011, which pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 6.4 and Local Rules 7-3, required all supporting affidavits and declarations to be filed on March 18, 2011. The Lui Declaration was filed on March 19, 2011. This is cause to strike it in its entirety. Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule ("FRE") 402. Not relevant. SCEA's connection to California is not relevant since Mr. Hotz had never heard of SCEA prior to being sued by SCEA. Hotz Declaration ¶¶ 2-3. FRE 602. No personal knowledge. No foundation. Declarant has not stated how she knows the facts that she testifies to. Simply stating a job title in paragraph 1 cannot suffice. FRE 402. Not relevant. FRE 403. Confusion of issues, misleading, and waste of time. Confusing and misleading as to who is the manufacturer of the Playstation computer and the relevancy of the distributor. Statements regarding distribution are a waste of time. Needless presentation of cumulative evidence. FRE 602. No personal knowledge / foundation for testimony. FRE 402. Not relevant. FRE 403. Needless presentation of cumulative evidence. FRE 602. No personal knowledge / foundation for testimony. FRE 402. Not relevant. FRE 602. No personal knowledge / foundation for testimony. FRE 402. Not relevant. FRE 602. No personal knowledge / foundation for testimony. FRE 402. Not relevant. FRE 602. No personal knowledge / foundation for testimony. /// ///
Paragraph 2.
Paragraph 3. Entire paragraph.
Paragraph 4. Entire paragraph.
Paragraph 5. Entire paragraph.
Paragraph 6. Entire paragraph.
Paragraph 7. Entire paragraph
-224045.01/4826-1353-2169, v. 1
OBJECTIONS TO LIU DECLARATION (NO. 11-CV-000167 SI)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
For the foregoing reasons, including SCEA's untimely filing, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court strike the declaration in its entirety. In the event this Court chooses not to strike the declaration in its entirety, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court to strike the testimony referred to above.
Dated: March 24, 2011. MBV LAW LLP
By
/s/ Stewart Kellar Stewart Kellar Attorneys for Defendant George Hotz 4826-1353-2169, v. 2
-324045.01/4826-1353-2169, v. 1
OBJECTIONS TO LIU DECLARATION (NO. 11-CV-000167 SI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?