Hendricks v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Filing
38
STIPULATION and Proposed Order For Extension of Time To File Reply by AT&T Mobility LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Cornehl, Lisa) (Filed on 8/23/2011)
I
MAYER BROV/N LLP
JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 181128)
2
jnado
LISA W
J
4
5
.com
(sBN 232733)
lcornehl@mayerbrown, com
350 South Grand Avenue
25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
Telephone: (213) 229-9500
Facsimile: (213) 625-0248
6
7
MAYER BROWN LLP
DONALD M. FALK (S8N150256)
8
dfalk@mayerbrown,com
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
Telephone: (650) 33 I -2000
Facsimile: (650) 33 1 -2060
9
l0
ll
Attorneys for Defendant
12
AT&T Mobility LLC
l3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
t4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
l5
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
T6
t7
PATRICK HENDRICKS, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
18
Plaintiff,
T9
VS,
20
2l
AT&T MOBILITY,LLC,
Defendant.
Case
No. Cl1-00409 CRB
DECLARATION OF KEVIN RANLETT
IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND
IPROPOSEDI ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
Date: September 23,201I
Time: l0:00 a.m.
Courtroom
8
22
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF KEVIN RANLETT;
CASE NO. CVI I-OO4O9 CRB
1
2
J
4
5
6
I, Kevin Ranlett, hereby declare as follows:
1.
The following facts are of my own personal knowledge, and if called as a witness
I could and would testify competently
2.
I
as
to their truth.
am an attorney with the law firm of Mayer Brown LLP, and
I
am one of the
counsel for defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM") in this case.
3.
ATTM requests an eleven-day extension of time to file its Reply in support of its
7
Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case. The new deadline would be September 9,2011,
8
which is 14 days before the scheduled hearing on the motion on September 23,2011. The
9
hearing date would not be affected
10
ll
12
13
t4
l5
by granting the extension, which ATTM requests to
accommodate the scheduling commitments of its counsel,
4.
5.
No modifications of time have been entered in this action'
On August 19,2011,
I
spoke with counsel for plaintiff Patrick Hendricks, who
agreed not to oppose a request for an eleven-day extension of
ATTM's time to file its Reply.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed
on
August 23,2011, at Washington, D.C.
16
I7
/s Kevin Ranlett
Kevin Ranlett
18
19
20
2l
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF KEVIN RANLETT;
CASE NO. CVII-OO4O9 CRB
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
I am employed in Los Angeles County, California. I am over the age of
2
eighteen years
J
and not aparty to the within-entitled action. My business address is 350 South Grand Avenue,
4
25th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071-1503. On August 23,2011, the following document
5
was served electronically via the CM/ECF system:
DECLARATION OF KEVIN RANLETT IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSEDI ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
6
7
I further certify that I mailed the foregoing document in a sealed envelope with postage
8
thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California addressed as set forth
9
l0
1l
12
13
t4
below:
Aaron P. Davis
Barry L. Davis
Daniel R. Lever
THORNTON DAVIS & FEIN, P.A.
80 SW Eighth Street
Miami, FL 33130
Telephone: (305) 446-2646
l5
I am readily familiar with the frrm's practice of collection
and processing correspondence
16
for mailing. Under that practice the envelopes would be deposited with the U,S. Postal Service
t7
on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am
l8
aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid
T9
or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit,
direction the service was made.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
22
23
date
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose
20
2l
if postal cancellation
is true and correct.
Executed on August 23,2011, at Los Angeles, California.
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE ; CASE NO. CVl l-00409 CRB
700008386
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?