Hendricks v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Filing 54

RESPONSE (re 51 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Brief Addressing Judicial Estoppel ) Non-Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief Addressing Judicial Estoppel, and Motion for Leave to File Response filed byAT&T Mobility LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Supplement Response to Supplemental Brief Addressing Judicial Estoppel, # 3 Declaration of Kevin S. Ranlett)(Ranlett, Kevin) (Filed on 10/19/2011)

1
2
3
4

DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256)
[e-mail]
MAYER BROWN LLP
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8

John Nadolenco (CA Bar No. 181128)
[e-mail]
MAYER BROWN LLP
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

9
Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

PATRICK HENDRICKS, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,

15

Plaintiff,

16
v.

Case No. CV 11-00409-CRB
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S
MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

17
AT&T MOBILITY LLC,
18

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Defendant.

19
20
The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief
21

Addressing Judicial Estoppel and Defendant’s Non-Opposition to that Motion and Motion for

22
Leave to File a Response, as well as all other materials properly available to the Court, hereby
23
GRANTS the Motions.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27

Dated:

________________________
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS; CASE NO. CV 11-00409-CRB