Hess et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 8, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/8/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Hess et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 MICHAEL ALLEN HESS and DYNESE MOUZAKIS, Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., QUALIFY LOAN SERVICING CORPORATION, and DEUTSCHE BACK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Defendants. / Upon reassignment of this case to the undersigned and pursuant to the reassignment order, defendants Select Portfolio Servicing and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint (Dkt. No. 18). Defendant noticed the hearing for April 28, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to defendants' motion was due on April 7, 2011, but no such opposition has been received. Plaintiffs Michael Allen Hess and Dynese Mouzakis are ordered to respond by APRIL 29, 2011, and show cause for their failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The motion hearing and case management conference on April 28, 2011, are VACATED. A new hearing and conference shall be noticed by No. C 11-00458 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 the Court if necessary. If plaintiffs do not respond by April 29, 2011, this case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: April 8, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?