Mason v. CSK Auto, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 3/31/2011. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/9/11. (Attachments: # 1 cos)(sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011)

Download PDF
Mason v. CSK Auto, Inc. Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 BARBARA MASON, Plaintiff, v. KRAGEN AUTO PARTS, Defendant. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 3, 2011, Plaintiff Barbara Mason, appearing pro se, filed a complaint in the Superior Court for the County of Alameda against Defendant Kragen Auto Parts. Defendant CSK Auto, Inc. d/b/a Kragen Auto Parts removed the action to this Court on January 31, 2011. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss all causes of action in the complaint and noticed the motion for hearing on March 18, 2011. Plaintiff's opposition brief or statement of nonopposition was due by February 25, 2011. Plaintiff has not filed any opposition or response to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff Barbara Mason is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, by March 31, 2011, why the motion to dismiss pending against her should not be granted in light of Plaintiff's failure to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely response to this show cause Order will result in a dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE No. C 11-00464 JSW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In light of the foregoing, the March 18, 2011 hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss is VACATED. The hearing will be reset by the Court in a separate order if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 9, 2011 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?