Kennedy v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al
Filing
42
ORDER VACATING OCTOBER 14, 2011 HEARING ON DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court deems the matters suitable for deci sion thereon, and vacates the hearing scheduled for October 14, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 12, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/12/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
WILLIAM KENNEDY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
ORDER VACATING OCTOBER 14, 2011
HEARING ON DEFENDANT WELLS
FARGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND
MOTION TO STRIKE
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
No. C-11-0675 MMC
/
Before the Court is the motion of defendant Wachovia Mortgage, “a division of Wells
17
Fargo Bank, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB” (“Wells
18
Fargo”) (see Mot. at 1:23-24), filed September 9, 2011, to dismiss plaintiff William
19
Kennedy’s (“Kennedy”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”); Kennedy has filed opposition
20
thereto, to which Wells Fargo has replied. Also before the Court is Wells Fargo’s motion,
21
likewise filed September 9, 2011, to strike portions of the SAC; Kennedy has filed a
22
separate opposition thereto, to which Wells Fargo has separately replied. Having read and
23
considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court deems
24
the matters suitable for decision thereon, and hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for
25
October 14, 2011.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: October 12, 2010
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?