Milyakov et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 80

ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 79 Brief, filed by Emil Milyakov, Magdalena A. Apostolova. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 29, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

EMIL P. MILYAKOV and
MAGDALENA A.APOSTOLOVA,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

No. C 11-02066 WHA

ORDER STRIKING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

v.
JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., HSBC BANK
USA, NA, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE
CO., PAUL FINANCIAL, LLC, MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC. (MERS), FOUNDATION
CONVEYANCING, LLC, and DOES 1
through 100,
Defendants.
/

19
20

Pro se plaintiffs Emil Milyakov and Magdalena Apostolova have filed a “supplemental

21

brief in support of the motion to remand as an alternative to continue the hearing on the motion

22

for summary judgment” (Dkt. No. 79). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) “once a reply is filed,

23

no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior Court approval” unless new

24

evidence has been submitted in the reply brief or the party seeks to file a statement of recent

25

decision. Plaintiffs filed a reply to the motion to remand on November 15, 2011. The

26

supplemental brief in support of the motion to remand is not a statement of recent decision.

27
28

1

Plaintiffs were not granted leave to file the supplemental brief. Briefing on the motion to remand

2

has closed. Plaintiffs’ submission at this time is improper. Thus, the supplemental brief is

3

STRICKEN.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: November 29, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2