Milyakov et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 80

ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 79 Brief, filed by Emil Milyakov, Magdalena A. Apostolova. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 29, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 EMIL P. MILYAKOV and MAGDALENA A.APOSTOLOVA, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 No. C 11-02066 WHA ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF v. JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., HSBC BANK USA, NA, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE CO., PAUL FINANCIAL, LLC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS), FOUNDATION CONVEYANCING, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. / 19 20 Pro se plaintiffs Emil Milyakov and Magdalena Apostolova have filed a “supplemental 21 brief in support of the motion to remand as an alternative to continue the hearing on the motion 22 for summary judgment” (Dkt. No. 79). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) “once a reply is filed, 23 no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior Court approval” unless new 24 evidence has been submitted in the reply brief or the party seeks to file a statement of recent 25 decision. Plaintiffs filed a reply to the motion to remand on November 15, 2011. The 26 supplemental brief in support of the motion to remand is not a statement of recent decision. 27 28 1 Plaintiffs were not granted leave to file the supplemental brief. Briefing on the motion to remand 2 has closed. Plaintiffs’ submission at this time is improper. Thus, the supplemental brief is 3 STRICKEN. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: November 29, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?