T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 174

MOTION for Reconsideration re 90 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,,,, PLAINTIFFS T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER DISMISSING T-MOBILE'S CARTWRIGHT ACT, UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW, AND DONNELLY ACT CLAIMS filed by T-Mobile USA Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rubinstein, Jason) (Filed on 3/29/2013)

1
2
3
4

Kathryn Parsons Hoek (CA Bar No. 219247)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10

Parker C. Folse (pro hac vice)
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave., Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
Jason C. Rubinstein (pro hac vice)
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.
12
13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

16

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

This Document Relates to
17

Case C 3:11-02591 SI
18
19

T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,

20

Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24

v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
THE COURT’S ORDER DISMISSING
ITS CARTWRIGHT ACT, UNFAIR
COMPETITION LAW, AND DONNELLY
ACT CLAIMS

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL No. 1827

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
T-MOBILE’S U.S.A., INC.’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S ORDER
DISMISSING ITS CARTWRIGHT ACT, UNFAIR
COMPETITION LAW, AND DONNELLY ACT CLAIMS

1

Upon consideration of Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.’s Motion for Reconsideration of

2

the Court’s Order Dismissing its Cartwright Act, Unfair Competition Law, and Donnelly Act

3

Claims, all papers filed in support of and in opposition to said motion, and the arguments of

4

counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

5

Pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7-9 of the Northern

6

District of California Local Rules, Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.’s Motion for Reconsideration

7

of the Court’s Order Dismissing its Cartwright Act, Unfair Competition Law, and Donnelly Act

8

Claims is GRANTED in its entirety, and all of Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.’s claims under the
Cartwright Act, California Unfair Competition Law, and New York Donnelly Act are hereby

9

reinstated.
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

DATED:__________________

14

_______________________________
Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL No. 1827

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
T-MOBILE’S U.S.A., INC.’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S ORDER
DISMISSING ITS CARTWRIGHT ACT, UNFAIR
COMPETITION LAW, AND DONNELLY ACT CLAIMS