T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 39

Request for Judicial Notice re 37 Joinder, filed byPhilips Electronics North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) 37 ) (Cullen, Brendan) (Filed on 9/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172) (beeneyg@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) (cullenb@sullcrom.com) Shawn Joe Lichaa (SBN 250902) (lichaas@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 Attorneys for Philips Electronics North America Corporation 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRSICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION 17 This Document Relates to: Case No. 11-cv-2591 18 T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC., 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., 22 Defendants. 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. M07-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 Case No. 11-cv-2591 PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Judge: The Hon. Susan Illston Courtroom: 10, 19th Floor Hearing Date: October 28, 2011 Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m. 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI 1 2 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Philips Electronics North 3 America Corporation (“PENAC”) respectfully requests that this Court take judicial notice of the 4 following fact in support of PENAC’s Motion to Dismiss T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.’s Complaint: 5  PENAC is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. 6 The state of incorporation of an entity is a proper subject of judicial notice. Federal Rule 7 of Evidence 201(b) provides for judicial notice of facts that are “not subject to reasonable dispute in that 8 [they] are either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of 9 accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” 10 Fed. R. Evid. 201(b); see also MGIC Indem. Corp. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 504 (9th Cir. 1986) 11 (holding that a court may take judicial notice of matters of public record); Mukamal v. Bakes, 383 B.R. 12 798, 818 n.21 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (taking judicial notice of state of incorporation in determining to apply 13 Delaware law in motion to dismiss). 14 Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the entity search results for 15 “Philips Electronics North America Corporation” on the web-site of the Department of State, Division 16 of Corporations for the State of Delaware, indicating that PENAC is incorporated in Delaware. 17 18 For the foregoing reasons, PENAC respectfully requests that this Court take judicial notice that its state of incorporation is the State of Delaware. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -1PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI 1 Dated: September 15, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 /s/ Brendan P. Cullen Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) Shawn Joe Lichaa (SBN 250902) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant Philips Electronics North America Corporation 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -2PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?