T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 73

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal T-Mobile's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Dismiss filed by T-Mobile USA Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jason Rubinstein, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal)(Taylor, Brooke) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

David Orozco (CA Bar No. 220732)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11

Parker C. Folse (pro hac vice)
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
Jason C. Rubinstein (pro hac vice)
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12

Counsel for T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

This Document Relates to
Case C 3:11-02591 SI
T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,
Plaintiff,

20
21

v.

22

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

23

Defendants.
24

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF T-MOBILE U.S.A.,
INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO
FILE UNDER SEAL ITS
OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG SDI
CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG SDI
AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS T-MOBILE’S CLAIMS
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA’S
CARTWRIGHT ACT AND UNFAIR
COMPETITION LAW

25

[Civil Local Rule 79-5]

26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG SDI’S
MOTION TO DISMISS T-MOBILE’S CLAIMS.

1

Having considered the application regarding whether a certain document Plaintiff

2

T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T-Mobile”) lodged with the Court should be filed under seal pursuant to

3

Civil Local Rules 79-5 and 7-10 and the Court’s Standing Order, and good cause appearing, the

4

application is hereby GRANTED.

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that T-Mobile’s Redacted Opposition to Defendants

6

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.’s and Samsung SDI America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss T-Mobile’s

7

Claims Pursuant to California’s Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Law (“Opposition

8

Brief”) has been redacted and publicly filed. An unredacted copy of T-Mobile’s Opposition

9

Brief shall remain under seal.

10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to maintain the effect of the seal under Civil

11

Local Rule 79-5, the parties, their counsel, and their declarants shall not publicly disseminate or

12

discuss any of the sealed documents or their contents absent further order of the Court.

13

SO ORDERED:

14
15

Dated:_________________________

___________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG SDI’S
MOTION TO DISMISS T-MOBILE’S CLAIMS.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28