Henry v. State of Alaska Department of Revenue Child Support Services Division et al

Filing 50

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL (Dkt. No. 48). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/3/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 RONALD HENRY, Northern District of California United States District Court 12 Plaintiff, 13 Case No.: 11-3255 (JSC) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL (Dkt. No. 48) v. 14 15 16 17 STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION, et al., Defendants. 18 19 The Court is in receipt of a communication from Plaintiff dated May 2, 2012 that states 20 Plaintiff will not appear at the May 3, 2012 hearing and requests dismissal of this action. (Dkt. 21 No. 48.) Plaintiff notes that due to a state court case resolved in Plaintiff’s favor on April 23, 22 2012, “the action Plaintiff has brought in this court can no longer proceed as the underlying 23 causes of action alleged by Plaintiff are now moot by the vacation of those state court orders.” 24 (Dkt. No. 48 at 3.) Due to the late hour of Plaintiff’s notice, Defendant appeared at the May 3, 25 2012 hearing without knowledge of this state court case that, according to Plaintiff, “ordered 26 the release of Plaintiff’s commercial driver license” and rendered this federal action moot. 27 (Dkt. No. 48 at 2.) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 28 1 39) is under submission, and Defendant should file its response to Plaintiff’s communication 2 on or before May 17, 2012. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: May 3, 2012 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?