Diaz v. Cate et al
Filing
46
ORDER denying 43 Request forleave to propound additional interrogatories filed by Sergio Diaz. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/15/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SERGIO DIAZ, AA8053,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
v.
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
Defendant(s).
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-3459 CRB (PR)
ORDER
(Docket #43)
12
13
On October 29, 2012, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on
14
plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim that he was deprived of various basic needs
15
while on contraband surveillance watch. Since then, plaintiff has sought and
16
obtained three extensions of time (totaling five months) to submit his opposition
17
to the motion. His last deadline to file an opposition was March 29, 2013; but
18
rather than file one, he filed a fourth request for additional time to conduct further
19
discovery.
20
For the reasons set forth in defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s request for
21
leave to propound additional interrogatories and for an additional extension of
22
time, plaintiff’s request (docket # 43) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall file an
23
opposition by no later than May 3, 2013 and defendants shall file a reply within
24
14 days thereafter. No further extensions of time will be entertained.
25
SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: April 15, 2013
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.11\Diaz, S.11-3459.or2.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?