Gordon v. Cate et al

Filing 37

ORDER EXTENDING TIME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/30/13. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 *E-Filed 1/30/13* 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 ORDER EXTENDING TIME Plaintiff, 13 14 No. C 11-3593 RS (PR) MARVIN R. GORDON, v. 15 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 16 Defendants. / 17 18 Plaintiff’s motion to extend time to file a response to defendants’ motion to dismiss 19 (Docket No. 36) is GRANTED. Such motion shall be filed on or before April 1, 2013. If 20 plaintiff does not file a response by such date, the Court will deem him to have waived his 21 right to file an opposition to the motion. Plaintiff’s motion to compel a response to his first 22 amended complaint (Docket No. 28) is DENIED as moot, defendants having responded. The 23 Clerk shall terminate Docket Nos. 28 and 36. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 30, 2013 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 27 28 No. C 11-3593 RS (PR) ORDER EXTENDING TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?