Miranda v. Cate et al
Filing
5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/31/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2011: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service) (cl, COURT STAFF).
1
*E-Filed 8/31/11*
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
6
7
JERRY M. MIRANDA,
Plaintiff,
8
9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 11-3749 RS (PR)
M. CATE, et al.,
11
Defendants.
/
12
13
This is a federal civil rights action filed by a pro se state prisoner pursuant to 42
14
U.S.C. § 1983. By order of the Court, plaintiff was granted 30 days (1) to file a complete
15
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) to pay the filing fee of $350.00, or
16
face dismissal of the action. More than 30 days have passed since the order was filed, and
17
plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, and his IFP application is incomplete, plaintiff having
18
submitted an unsigned Certificate of Funds, and having failed to file a prison trust account
19
statement detailing transactions for the last six months. Accordingly, the action is
20
DISMISSED without prejudice as to plaintiff filing (1) a filled-out Certificate of Funds
21
signed by an authorized prison officer, and (2) a prison trust account statement showing
22
transactions for the last six months. Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP (Docket No. 4) is
23
DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate Docket No. 4, enter judgment in favor
24
of defendants, and close the file.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 31, 2011
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
28
No. C 11-3749 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?