McBrien v. United States

Filing 5

ORDER re 3 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and Regarding Consent or Declination of this Court's Jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 08/09/2011. (Attachments: #(1) cert serv)(kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 KAREN MCBRIEN, Plaintiffs, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 v. 11 12 UNITED STATES, ET AL., No. C-11-3761-EDL ORDER REGARDING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REGARDING CONSENT OR DECLINATION OF THIS COURT’S JURISDICTION Defendants. 13 14 Pro se Plaintiff Karen McBrien has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Her 15 16 application is unclear in the following respects and must be amended before the Court can rule on 17 the application: 18 1. Section 2 indicates that Plaintiff owns Intel stock and receives a “small interest amount.” 19 Plaintiff should specify the value of the stock and the amount of interest received 20 annually. 21 2. income received annually or otherwise. 22 23 Section 7 indicates that Plaintiff receives a “Fidelity Pension” but does not specify the 3. Section 10 indicates that Plaintiff’s complaint raises claims that have been presented in 24 other lawsuits in this district, but does not provide case numbers or names as required. 25 Plaintiff should provide further information about these lawsuits. 26 27 28 Plaintiff has not filed a consent to this Magistrate Court’s jurisdiction, or requested reassignment to a district court judge. Plaintiff should file a consent or declination when filing her 1 2 amended application to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: August 9, 2011 5 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?