Nicholaw v. Board of Supervisors
Filing
13
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DISMISSAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 20, 2011. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/20/2011: # 1 Cert Serve) (klhS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ANDY NICHOLAW,
No. C-11-4272 JCS
9
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO
DISMISSAL ORDER
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
[Docket Nos. 11, 12]
12
13
Defendants.
_________________________________
14
15
Plaintiff Andy Nicholaw has filed an “Objection to Order Dismissing Complaint” on the
16
ground that the Defendants have not consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge and thus
17
this Court lacked jurisdiction to dismiss the action. Docket No. 11. The Court declines to consider
18
Plaintiff’s objection as this matter has been dismissed. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Default Judgment to
19
Compel Performance” (Docket No. 12) is also moot as this case has been dismissed.
20
The Court does not require the consent of the defendants in order to properly dismiss the
21
action as frivolous because defendants have not been served, and, as a result, are not parties to the
22
action. See Neals v. Norwood, 59 F.3d 530, 532 (5th Cir.1995) (holding that magistrate judge had
23
jurisdiction to dismiss prison inmate’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as frivolous without consent of
24
defendants because defendants had not been served yet and therefore were not parties); see also,
25
Merino v. Saxon Mortg. Inc., 2011 WL 794988, *1 (N.D. Cal. Mar 1, 2011) (“Defendants that have
26
not been served are not parties under the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and therefore, their consent
27
is not necessary for the Court to rule on this dispositive motion.”).
28
1
1
In the present case, Plaintiff consented to magistrate jurisdiction. Because the defendants
2
have not been served, they are not parties and the Court had jurisdiction to enter the dismissal order.
3
Dated: December 20, 2011
4
______________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?