Nicholaw v. Board of Supervisors
Filing
17
ORDER. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 9, 2012. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/9/2012: # 1 Cert Serve) (klhS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ANDY NICHOLAW,
No. C-11-4272 JCS
9
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
[Docket Nos. 14, 15]
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
12
13
Defendants.
_________________________________
14
15
Plaintiff Andy Nicholaw has filed a “Declination to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and
16
Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge” and has also filed a “Second Objection
17
to Order Dismissing Complaint & Request for De Novo Review.” Docket Nos. 14, 15.
18
Because the Plaintiff has previously consented to magistrate jurisdiction, the purported
19
declination is untimely and the Court cannot consider it. This matter has been dismissed by the
20
Court. See Docket Nos. 8, 13. Therefore, the Court construes Plaintiff’s recent filings as a motion
21
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (the “Motion”). Having carefully considered the
22
Plaintiff’s arguments and the papers submitted, the Court find no factual or legal ground to
23
reconsider the dismissal.
24
/
25
/
26
/
27
/
28
1
1
The Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: January 9, 2012
4
______________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?