Hickman v. City of Berkeley et al

Filing 116

ORDER byMagistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 115 Stipulation to Continue Settlement Conference. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/24/2013: # 1 Proof of Service) (rmm2S, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 5 Zach Cowan, City Attorney, SBN 96372 Matthew J. Orebic, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 124491 BERKELEY CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 2180 Milvia Street, Fourth Floor Berkeley, CA 94704 Telephone: (510) 981-6998 Facsimile: (510) 981-6960 Email: morebic@ci.berkeley.ca.us 6 Attorneys for Defendant ELIZABETH BASHAN 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 Lawrence Hickman 1807 Prince Street Berkeley, CA 94703 Telephone: (510) 467-4250 Facsimile: (510) 580-9413 Email: lpacificquest@aol.com 11 12 Pro Se 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 LAWRENCE HICKMAN, Plaintiff, vs. DOUGLAS HAMBLETON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C 11-04395 EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE FROM APRIL 5, 2013 TO MAY 22, 2013 23 24 25 Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant herein stipulate to continue the Settlement Conference from April 5, 2013 to May 22, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Lawrence Hickman vs. City of Berkeley et al. Case No. C 11-04395 -1- 1 DATED: January 24, 2013 2 ZACH COWAN, City Attorney MATTHEW J. OREBIC, Deputy City Attorney By: /s/ Matthew J. Orebic MATTHEW J. OREBIC Attorneys for Defendant ELIZABETH BASHAN 3 4 5 6 LAWRENCE HICKMAN DATED: January 24, 2013 7 By: /s/ Lawrence Hickman Pro Se 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 18 January 24, Dated: ________________ 2013 __________________________________ HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Lawrence Hickman vs. City of Berkeley et al. Case No. C 11-04395 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?