Hickman v. City of Berkeley et al
Filing
116
ORDER byMagistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 115 Stipulation to Continue Settlement Conference. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/24/2013: # 1 Proof of Service) (rmm2S, COURT STAFF).
1
5
Zach Cowan, City Attorney, SBN 96372
Matthew J. Orebic, Deputy City Attorney, SBN 124491
BERKELEY CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
2180 Milvia Street, Fourth Floor
Berkeley, CA 94704
Telephone: (510) 981-6998
Facsimile: (510) 981-6960
Email: morebic@ci.berkeley.ca.us
6
Attorneys for Defendant ELIZABETH BASHAN
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
Lawrence Hickman
1807 Prince Street
Berkeley, CA 94703
Telephone: (510) 467-4250
Facsimile: (510) 580-9413
Email: lpacificquest@aol.com
11
12
Pro Se
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
LAWRENCE HICKMAN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DOUGLAS HAMBLETON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 11-04395 EDL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE FROM APRIL 5, 2013 TO
MAY 22, 2013
23
24
25
Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant herein stipulate to continue the Settlement
Conference from April 5, 2013 to May 22, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Lawrence Hickman vs. City of Berkeley et al. Case No. C 11-04395
-1-
1
DATED: January 24, 2013
2
ZACH COWAN, City Attorney
MATTHEW J. OREBIC, Deputy City Attorney
By: /s/ Matthew J. Orebic
MATTHEW J. OREBIC
Attorneys for Defendant ELIZABETH BASHAN
3
4
5
6
LAWRENCE HICKMAN
DATED: January 24, 2013
7
By: /s/ Lawrence Hickman
Pro Se
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
18
January 24,
Dated: ________________ 2013
__________________________________
HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Lawrence Hickman vs. City of Berkeley et al. Case No. C 11-04395
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?