Krushwitz v. University of California at Berkeley

Filing 25

NOTICE REGARDING LEGAL HELP DESK, HANDBOOK FOR LITIGANTS WITHOUT A LAWYER, AND LEGAL STANDARDS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS -Please refer to Additioanl attachment #4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/13/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certi ficate/Proof of Service, # 2 Pro Se Handbook, # 3 Legal Help Desk Flyer)(ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/13/2012: # 4 Notice Regarding Legal Help - Document #1 Amended Attachment) (ls, COURT STAFF). Modified on 4/13/2012 (ls, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 Oakland Division 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 KAREN KRUSHWITZ, 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 No. C 11-04676 LB ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 15 16 17 [ECF No. 2] Defendant. _____________________________________/ Plaintiff has filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Having considered the 18 application and complaint, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's application. The Clerk of Court 19 shall issue the summons. Furthermore, the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California shall 20 serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments or attachments, 21 Plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon Defendant. Additionally, given the timing of this order, the 22 court extends Plaintiff’s time to serve to March 1, 2012. See Efaw v. Williams, 473 F.3d 1038, 1041 23 (9th Cir. 2007) (“District courts have broad discretion to extend time for service under Rule 4(m).”); 24 cf. Puett v. Blandford, 912 F.2d 270, 275 (9th Cir. 1990). This dispose of ECF No. 2. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2011 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 28 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS C 11-04676 LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?