Fox v. Shinseki

Filing 60

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO ORDER SHORTENING TIME. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/1/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

Jamie Fox,
Plaintiff,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. CV 11-04820 EDL
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO ORDER
SHORTENING TIME

v.

11

Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of the Department of

12

Veterans Affairs, Agency,

13

Defendant.

/

14
15

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s request to hear its motion for

16

an order permitting Defendant to provide a claim file for use in litigation, which was filed after the

17

time for the Court’s consideration of the request had elapsed. Dkt. Nos. 58. The Court granted the

18

request to shorten the time for hearing the motion by three days, and that Order remains in effect.

19

Dkt. No. 59. However, Plaintiff’s opposition indicates that she intends to submit a request for

20

continuance of all pending motions in this case. Dkt. No. 58 at 3. Any such request must be made

21

in writing in compliance with the Local Rules after appropriate efforts to meet and confer, and

22

should be made at the earliest possible time so that the Court can consider the request well in

23

advance of upcoming briefing deadlines for the pending motions.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: November 1, 20112
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge