Stuckey et al v. Lucas et al

Filing 69

ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS 62 64 65 66 67 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/17/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS Plaintiffs, 8 9 No. C 11-05196 SI STUCKEY, et al., v. LUCAS, et al., Defendants. / 12 On November 27, 2012, the Court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim, 13 with prejudice. That same day, the Court also entered judgment against plaintiff in accordance with that 14 dismissal. Therefore, the Court will not entertain defendants’ or plaintiffs’ additional motions because 15 they are moot. This Order resolves Docket Nos. 62, 64, 65, 66 and 67. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 17, 2012 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?