Stuckey et al v. Lucas et al
Filing
69
ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS 62 64 65 66 67 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/17/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS
Plaintiffs,
8
9
No. C 11-05196 SI
STUCKEY, et al.,
v.
LUCAS, et al.,
Defendants.
/
12
On November 27, 2012, the Court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim,
13
with prejudice. That same day, the Court also entered judgment against plaintiff in accordance with that
14
dismissal. Therefore, the Court will not entertain defendants’ or plaintiffs’ additional motions because
15
they are moot. This Order resolves Docket Nos. 62, 64, 65, 66 and 67.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: December 17, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?