Larkin v. Carlson

Filing 4

ORDER Granting Extension of Time to File In Forma Pauperis Application. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 02/01/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

No. C-11-6321 TEH (PR)

JETHRO LARKIN III,

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION

Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES CARLSON,
Defendant.

15
/
16
17
18

On December 14, 2011, Plaintiff, a state prisoner

19

incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison in San Quentin, California,

20

filed this pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

21

That day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that his in forma pauperis

22

application was incomplete because he failed to submit a Certificate

23

of Funds in Prisoner’s Account completed and signed by an authorized

24

officer at the prison.

25

On January 25, 2012, Plaintiff submitted monthly Inmate

26

Statement Reports from 2011, and informed the Court that he has

27

attempted to obtain a completed and signed Certificate of Funds in

28

Prisoner’s Account without success.

Plaintiff is granted an

1

extension of time to March 1, 2012 to submit a completed and signed

2

Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s Account form.

3

directed to include a Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s Account

4

form with this order, and a return envelope.

5

ordered to assist Plaintiff in completing the necessary paperwork.

6

Plaintiff is reminded that any motions or correspondence

The Clerk is

Prison officials are

7

which he sends to the court should bear the case name and number.

8

For filings in this instant case, Plaintiff would list the following

9

on the front page of any future filings: Larkin v. Carlson, C No.

10

11-CV-6321 TEH.

11

filing was referring to cases other than this instant case,

12

Plaintiff should re-file his motion in the other cases and list the

13

appropriate case name and number on the front page of his motion.

To the extent that Plaintiff’s January 25, 2012

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17

DATED

02/01/2012
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22

G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.11\Larkin-11-6321-eot-ifp.wpd

23
24
25
26
27
28

2