Bridgewater v. Dekalb County et al

Filing 5

NOTICE REGARDING MOTION TO TRANSFER re 4 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Sharon Bridgewater. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 7, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, v. NOTICE REGARDING MOTION TO TRANSFER DEKALB COUNTY, et al., Defendants. / 13 14 No. 11-mc-80265 WHA SHARON BRIDGEWATER, In this miscellaneous matter, plaintiff’s complaint was reviewed pursuant to a previous 15 order that imposed a pre-filing screening requirement for all of plaintiff’s complaints. The 16 complaint was allowed to pass pre-filing review (Dkt. No. 3). Thus, a new action will be 17 commenced and the complaint will be assigned a civil docket number different from the 18 miscellaneous matter number listed above. 19 Plaintiff now has filed a motion in this miscellaneous matter seeking “to transfer [this] 20 case to Northern District Court of Georgia” [sic]. Plaintiff states that she “filed the case in at the 21 wrong federal district court” [sic] (Dkt. No. 4). The filing of a motion to transfer in this 22 miscellaneous matter was improper. Plaintiff must file any such motion in the new civil action. 23 Or, plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss her complaint without prejudice to re-filing it in Georgia. 24 No further action will be taken as to the improper motion to transfer filed in this docket. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: November 7, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?