Isaacs et al v. Countrywide Bank, N.A. et al
ORDER DEEMING AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re 16 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Countrywide Bank, N.A., The Bank of New York, Countrywide Home L oans Servicing, Recon Trust Company, 26 Renotice motion hearing, filed by Countrywide Bank, N.A., The Bank of New York, Country Wide Home Loans Servicing, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, Recon Trust Company. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 29, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/29/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THEODORE ISAACS and NORMA ISAACS
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 12-00951 WHA
COUNTRYWIDE BANK N.A., original
mortgage lender, COUNTRYWIDE HOME
LOANS SERVICING, a mortgage servicer,
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS
SERVICING, a nominee/beneficiary, NORTH
AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, Title
Company, THE BANK OF NEW YORK, and
RECON TRUST COMPANY, mortgage trustee,
ORDER DEEMING AMENDED
COMPLAINT FILED AND
DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO
DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR
On March 26, 2012, defendants Countrywide Bank, N.A., Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing, LP, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, and Recontrust Company, N.A.,
filed a motion to dismiss and request for judicial notice (Dkt. Nos. 16). This action was
reassigned to the undersigned judge on April 10, 2012. Defendants re-noticed their motion and
request for judicial notice on the same day. On May 24, 2012, the parties stipulated to the filing
of an amended complaint, a copy of which was appended to the stipulation (Dkt. Nos. 31, 32).
The amended complaint is deemed filed. Thus, the motion to dismiss and request for judicial
notice are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 29, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?