Meadows
Filing
5
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 4 Counsel and Extending Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
In Re
9
MICHANN MEADOWS,
Plaintiff.
___________________________________/
ORDER DENYING COUNSEL AND
EXTENDING DEADLINE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-12-0974 EMC (pr)
12
13
This action was opened on February 11, 2012, when the Court received from Michann
14
Meadows a letter to Judge Henderson that concerned prison conditions. On that date, the Court
15
notified Ms. Meadows in writing that her action was deficient in that she had not attached a
16
complaint and had not filed an in forma pauperis application. The Court further notified her that
17
this action would be dismissed if she did not submit a complaint within thirty days. Ms. Meadows
18
thereafter filed a request for an extension of time to proceed in this case and for appointment of
19
counsel.
20
A district court has the discretion under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(1) to designate counsel to
21
represent an indigent civil litigant in exceptional circumstances. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789
22
F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). This requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the
23
merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the
24
legal issues involved. See id. Neither of these factors is dispositive and both must be viewed
25
together before deciding on a request for counsel under § 1915(e)(1). Here, the Court cannot
26
determine that there is any likelihood of success because Ms. Meadows has not filed a complaint
27
alleging any claims. Even if she does file a complaint, the action likely will be transferred to the
28
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California; this Court will not appoint counsel if the
1
action will be transferred to another district. (The Court cannot say with certainty whether a transfer
2
will occur because there is no complaint on file; the Court predicts a transfer is likely based on the
3
fact that Ms. Meadows' letter concerns events and omissions at one or both of the women's prisons
4
in Madera County and therefore within the venue of the Eastern District of California.) Ms.
5
Meadows' request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Docket # 4.
6
Ms. Meadows' request for an extension of time to proceed is GRANTED. Docket # 4.
7
Ms. Meadows must file a complaint and a completed in forma pauperis application no later than
8
June 29, 2012. No extensions of this deadline should be expected. Failure to file a complaint and
9
an in forma pauperis application (or to pay the filing fee) by the deadline will result in the dismissal
of this action.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: May 18, 2012
15
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?