Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 195

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF LETTERS ROGATORY by Hon. William Alsup granting 192 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Alsop, # 2 Appendix Adkins, # 3 Appendix Lamb, # 4 Appendix Elguindi, # 5 Appendix Flint, # 6 Appendix Zachariassen, # 7 Appendix Mackintosh)(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10
11
12
13

NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES,
LLC

14

Plaintiff,

15

vs.

16

No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
LETTERS ROGATORY

FORTINET, INC.

17
18

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

GCA Law Partners LLP
1891 Landings Drive
Mountain View, CA 94043
[phone]

Order on Unopposed Administrative Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA

1

1

This Court, having considered the Unopposed Administrative Motion for the Issuance

2

of Letter Rogatory filed by Plaintiff Network Protection Sciences LLC brought pursuant to

3

Civil Local Rules 7-11 and consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(b) and 34(c), seeking the

4

issuance of Letters Rogatory to the appropriate judicial authority of Canada in order to

5

compel the oral testimony and the disclosure of documents from non-party witnesses John

6

Alsop, Glenn Mackintosh, Steven Lamb, Rayan Zachariassen, Rod Adkins, Omaya Elguindi,

7

and Andrew Flint.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Having considered the motion, and any other matters deemed to be appropriate by the
Court, and good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff, Network Protection Sciences, LLC
motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory is hereby GRANTED
The Unopposed Administrative Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory is
GRANTED. The court will sign and affix its seal to each of the letters rogatory submitted
and return the letters with original signatures and seals to Plaintiff’s counsel for forwarding to

15
the applicable Canadian court.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
This order is without prejudice to possible objections by the respondents that the discovery requests
are overbroad and burdensome, which objections will be heard in due course by the Canadian
23
courts.
Dated: April ___, 2013
Date: April 23, 2013.

By:
_______________________________
Honorable William H. Alsup
United States District Court
Northern District of California
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
U.S.A

24
25
26
27
28

GCA Law Partners LLP
1891 Landings Drive
Mountain View, CA 94043
[phone]

Order on Unopposed Administrative Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA

1