Yahoo! Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
37
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 16 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim,, 29 MOTION to Strike and/or Dismiss Yahoo Inc.'s Claims and Defenses of Inequitable Conduct filed by Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Smith, Kevin) (Filed on 6/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com
Kevin A. Smith (Bar No. 250814)
kevinsmith@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation,
CASE NO. CV-12-01212-JSW
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR:
vs.
FACEBOOK, INC, a Delaware corporation,
(1) YAHOO! INC.’S AMENDED REPLY
AND COUNTER COUNTERCLAIMS TO
FACEBOOK, INC.’S ANSWER AND
COUNTERCLAIMS AND
Defendant.
17
(2) BRIEFING AND HEARING ON
FACEBOOK, INC.'S MOTION TO
STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS YAHOO!
INC.'S CLAIMS AND DEFENSES OF
INEQUITABLE CONDUCT
18
19
20
[Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2]
21
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR YAHOO!’S AMENDED REPLY AND BRIEFING
CV-12-01212-JSW
1
2
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties file this Stipulation requesting an
3
enlargement of time for: (1) Yahoo! Inc. ("Yahoo!") to file an Amended Reply and Counter
4
Counterclaims to Facebook, Inc.’s ("Facebook") Answer and Counterclaims pursuant to Federal
5
Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1); and (2) briefing and hearing on Facebook, Inc.’s Motion to
6
Strike and/or Dismiss Yahoo!’s Claims and Defenses of Inequitable Conduct. This request is
7
supported by the attached Declaration of Kevin A. Smith.
8
9
10
11
12
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the
parties that:
1.
The time for Yahoo! to file an amended Reply and Counter Counterclaims to
Facebook’s Answer and Counterclaims shall be extended from June 20, 2012 to July 5, 2012;
2.
The time for Yahoo! to respond to Facebook's Motion to Strike and/or
13
Dismiss Yahoo!'s Claims and Defenses of Inequitable Conduct shall be extended from
14
July 5, 2012 to July 19, 2012;
15
3.
The time for Facebook to reply in support of its Motion to Strike and/or
16
Dismiss Yahoo!’s Claims and Defenses of Inequitable Conduct shall be extended from
17
July 12, 2012 to July 26, 2012.
18
4.
The hearing on the Motion to Strike and/or Dismiss Yahoo!'s Claims and
19
Defenses of Inequitable Conduct shall be rescheduled from August 10, 2012 at 9:00 am to
20
August 24, 2012 at 9:00 am.
21
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR YAHOO!’S AMENDED REPLY AND BRIEFING
2
CV-12-01212-JSW
1
2
Dated: June 19, 2012
3
By:
4
5
6
7
8
9
/s/ Mark Weinstein
Michael Graham Rhodes
Heidi Keefe
Joseph Haag
Mark Selwyn
Mark Weinstein
Stephen Neal
Cooley LLP
5 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Rea;
Palo Alto, CA 94306
10
Cynthia D. Vreeland
Lee F. William
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Attorneys for Facebook, Inc.
11
12
13
14
15
Dated: June 19, 2012
16
17
18
19
20
21
By:
/s/ Kevin A. Smith
Charles K. Verhoeven
Jennifer A. Kash
Kevin A. Smith
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-875-6600
Attorneys for Yahoo! Inc.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR YAHOO!’S AMENDED REPLY AND BRIEFING
3
CV-12-01212-JSW
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
Dated:
By:
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR YAHOO!’S AMENDED REPLY AND BRIEFING
4
CV-12-01212-JSW
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
3
I, Kevin A. Smith, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
4
Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Heidi Keefe, counsel
5
for Facebook, Inc., has concurred in this filing.
6
Dated: June 19, 2012
/s/ Kevin A. Smith
Kevin A. Smith
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR YAHOO!’S AMENDED REPLY AND BRIEFING
5
CV-12-01212-JSW
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
4
5
I, Kevin A. Smith, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California and the United States that the following is true and correct:
On June 19, 2012 I caused to be served the following document(s):
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR: (1) YAHOO!
INC.’S AMENDED REPLY AND COUNTER COUNTERCLAIMS TO FACEBOOK,
INC.’S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS AND (2) BRIEFING AND HEARING ON
FACEBOOK, INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS YAHOO! INC.'S
CLAIMS AND DEFENSES OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT
DECLARATION OF KEVIN SMITH IN SUPPORT OF THE STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR: (1) YAHOO! INC.’S AMENDED
REPLY AND COUNTER COUNTERCLAIMS TO FACEBOOK, INC.’S ANSWER AND
COUNTERCLAIMS AND (2) BRIEFING AND HEARING ON FACEBOOK INC.'S
MOTION TO STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS YAHOO INC.'S CLAIMS AND DEFENSES
OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT
17
via electronic mail to the following parties:
Michael Rhodes (rhoedsmg@cooley.com)
Heidi Keefe (hkeefe@cooley.com)
Joseph Haag (joseph.haag@wilmerhale.com)
Mark Selwyn (mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com)
Mark Weinstein (mweinstein@cooley.com)
Stephen Neal (nealsc@cooley.com)
18
via U.S. Mail to the following parties:
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
Cynthia D. Vreeland
Lee F. William
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Dated: June 19, 2012
/s/ Kevin A. Smith
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR YAHOO!’S AMENDED REPLY AND BRIEFING
6
CV-12-01212-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?