Rodgers v. Kellie et al

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge James Ware on May 3, 2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 RUSSELL DWAYNE RODGERS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 KELLIE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 12-01479 JW (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 18 On March 23, 2012, Plaintiff, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. That day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that his in forma pauperis 20 (“IFP”) application was incomplete because Plaintiff had failed to submit a 21 Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s Account completed and signed by an authorized 22 officer at the prison and failed to attach a copy of his prisoner trust account 23 statement showing transactions for the last six months. Along with the notice, the 24 Clerk mailed to Plaintiff the Court’s IFP forms, instructions for completing the 25 forms, and a stamped return envelope. In the notice, Plaintiff was informed that the 26 case would be dismissed if he did not either pay the fee or file a completed IFP 27 application within thirty days. More than thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has 28 neither paid the filing fee, filed an IFP application, nor explained his failure to do so. Order of Dismissal C:\Users\noblew\AppData\Local\Temp\fz3temp-1\Rogers-12-1479_ifp-dism.wpd 1 Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 2 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 DATED: May 3, 2012 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Dismissal C:\Users\noblew\AppData\Local\Temp\fz3temp-1\Rogers-12-1479_ifp-dism.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?