Young v. United States
Filing
5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 05/09/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. C-12-1481 TEH (PR)
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant.
15
/
16
17
On March 23, 2012, Plaintiff filed this pro se civil
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
That day, the Clerk notified
Plaintiff that he had neither paid the filing fee nor filed a
complete application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).
Along
with the notice, the Clerk mailed to Plaintiff the Court’s IFP
forms, instructions for completing the forms, and a stamped return
envelope.
In the notice, Plaintiff was informed that the action
would be dismissed if he did not either pay the fee or file a
completed IFP application within thirty days.
More than 30 days have passed, and Plaintiff has not paid
the filing fee, filed a complete IFP application or explained his
1
failure to do so.
2
PREJUDICE.
3
4
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions as moot and
close the file.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
DATED
05/09/2012
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
9
10
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.12\Young-12-1481_dismissal-ifp.wpd
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?