Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al

Filing 21

CLERKS NOTICE re Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge due by 5/25/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 2 Phone: 415-522-3140 3 RICHARD W. WIEKING CLERK OF COURT 4 May 14, 2012 5 6 7 Justin Clark 4934 Oaklefe Court Rockledge, FL 32955 8 9 10 11 Douglas Woodruff Colt Nichole Michelle Norris Thomas Edward Wallerstein Colt / Wallerstein LLP 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 540 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 12 13 Re: Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp., et al. C 12-1721 LB 14 Dear Parties: 15 This matter has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for all purposes including trial. 16 17 18 The magistrate judges of this district have been designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case including a jury or nonjury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment, upon the consent of all parties. 21 A review of our records discloses that the Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge has not been filed in this case. All parties are requested to complete one of the attached forms documenting either consent or request for reassignment and efile it with the Court by May 25, 2012. These forms can be found on the Court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. 22 Sincerely, 19 20 23 RICHARD W. WIEKING 24 25 By: Lashanda Scott Deputy Clerk 26 27 Attachments 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 Twitter, Inc., 11 12 No. C 12-1721 LB Plaintiff(s), CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. 13 Skootle Corp., et al., 14 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the undersigned party in the above-captioned civil matter hereby voluntarily consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 23 24 Dated: ________________________ ___________________________________ Signature 25 Counsel for _________________________ (Name or party or indicate “pro se”) 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 Twitter, Inc., 11 12 13 No. C 12-1721 LB Plaintiff(s), DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE v. Skootle Corp., et al., 14 15 16 Defendant(s). ____________________________________/ 17 18 19 20 21 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party in the above-captioned civil matter hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge. 22 23 24 Dated: ________________________ ___________________________________ Signature 25 Counsel for _________________________ (Name or party or indicate “pro se”) 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?