Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al
Filing
22
MOTION for permission for electronic case filing filed by Garland E. Harris. Responses due by 5/25/2012. Replies due by 6/1/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2012)
1 Name: Garland E. Harris
2
Address: 1011 Adams St.
W. Palm Beach, FL 33407
3
Phone Number:_4_12_-_3_34_-_84_4_0_ _ _ _ _ __
4
E-mail Address: garlandeharris@ gmail.com
5
ProSe
~.~~"""···
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
TWITTER, INC.
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
SKOOTLE CORP., ET AL.
12
C;
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Number: CV 12 1721
MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING
Judge LAUREL BEELER
-----------~D~e~fu~n~d=an~t~·-----~)
14
15
lljif" 'i''t':"""" • .. •
•. ... . 16
As the (Plaintiff/Defendant) defendant
in the above-captioned matter, I
respectfully; ask the Court for permission to participate in electronic case filing (."e-flling'') in thi
case. I hereby affirm that:
17
1. I have reviewed the requirements for e-filing and agree to abide by them.
18
2. I understand that once I register fore-filing, I will receive notices and documents onl
by email in this case and not by regular mail.
19
3. I have regular access to the technical requirements necessary toe-file successfully:
22
l.f IA computer with internet access;
l.f 1 email account on a daily basis to receive notifications from the Court and
An
notices from the e-filing system.
l.f I A scanner to convert documents that are only in paper format into electronic file ;
23
r'71 A p~inter or copier to create to create required paper copies such as chambers
lYJ copies;
20
21
l.f IA word-processing program to create documents; and
24
r7l A pdf reader and a pdf writer to convert word processing documents into pdf
lYJ format, the only electronic format in which documents can bee-filed.
25
26
Date:
28
Signature:---~£.._...,....,~----·_
7~
I'',..
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?