Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al

Filing 22

MOTION for permission for electronic case filing filed by Garland E. Harris. Responses due by 5/25/2012. Replies due by 6/1/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 Name: Garland E. Harris 2 Address: 1011 Adams St. W. Palm Beach, FL 33407 3 Phone Number:_4_12_-_3_34_-_84_4_0_ _ _ _ _ __ 4 E-mail Address: garlandeharris@ 5 ProSe ~.~~"""··· UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 TWITTER, INC. 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. SKOOTLE CORP., ET AL. 12 C; 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case Number: CV 12 1721 MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING Judge LAUREL BEELER -----------~D~e~fu~n~d=an~t~·-----~) 14 15 lljif" 'i''t':"""" • .. • •. ... . 16 As the (Plaintiff/Defendant) defendant in the above-captioned matter, I respectfully; ask the Court for permission to participate in electronic case filing (."e-flling'') in thi case. I hereby affirm that: 17 1. I have reviewed the requirements for e-filing and agree to abide by them. 18 2. I understand that once I register fore-filing, I will receive notices and documents onl by email in this case and not by regular mail. 19 3. I have regular access to the technical requirements necessary toe-file successfully: 22 l.f IA computer with internet access; l.f 1 email account on a daily basis to receive notifications from the Court and An notices from the e-filing system. l.f I A scanner to convert documents that are only in paper format into electronic file ; 23 r'71 A p~inter or copier to create to create required paper copies such as chambers lYJ copies; 20 21 l.f IA word-processing program to create documents; and 24 r7l A pdf reader and a pdf writer to convert word processing documents into pdf lYJ format, the only electronic format in which documents can bee-filed. 25 26 Date: 28 Signature:---~£.._...,....,~----·_ 7~ I'',..

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?