Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al

Filing 27

CLERKS NOTICE re Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge due by 5/25/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102

2

Phone: [phone]

3

RICHARD W. WIEKING
CLERK OF COURT

4
May 16, 2012

5
6
7

Garland Harris
1011 Adams Street
W. Palm Beach, FL 33407

8
9

Re:

Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp., et al.
C 12-1721 LB

10

Dear Mr. Harris:

11

This matter has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for
all purposes including trial.

12
13
14

The magistrate judges of this district have been designated to conduct any and all
proceedings in a civil case including a jury or nonjury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment,
upon the consent of all parties.

17

A review of our records discloses that the Consent to Proceed Before a United States
Magistrate Judge or Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment
to a United States District Judge has not been filed in this case. All parties are requested to
complete one of the attached forms documenting either consent or request for reassignment and efile it with the Court by May 25, 2012. These forms can be found on the Court’s website at
www.cand.uscourts.gov.

18

Sincerely,

15
16

19
RICHARD W. WIEKING

20
21

By: Lashanda Scott
Deputy Clerk

22
23

Attachments

24
25
26
27
28

1

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

Twitter, Inc.,

7
8

10
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9

11

No. C 12-1721 LB
Plaintiff(s),

CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

v.
Skootle Corp., et al.,
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the undersigned party
in the above-captioned civil matter hereby voluntarily consents to have a United States Magistrate
Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the entry of a
final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

19
20

Dated: ________________________

___________________________________
Signature

21
Counsel for _________________________
(Name or party or indicate “pro se”)

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

Twitter, Inc.,

7
8

Plaintiff(s),
DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

v.
Skootle Corp., et al.,

10
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9

No. C 12-1721 LB

11
12

Defendant(s).
____________________________________/

13
14
15
16
17

REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The undersigned party in the above-captioned civil matter hereby declines to consent to the
assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby
requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge.

18
19
20

Dated: ________________________

___________________________________
Signature

21
Counsel for _________________________
(Name or party or indicate “pro se”)

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3