Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al

Filing 68

MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Graves, Charles) (Filed on 11/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DAVID H. KRAMER, SBN 168452 CHARLES T. GRAVES, SBN 197923 RIANA S. PFEFFERKORN, SBN 266817 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Email: dkramer@wsgr.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff TWITTER, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. 3:12-cv-1721 SI 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 SKOOTLE CORP., a Tennessee corporation; and JAMES KESTER, an individual, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PL.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:12-CV-1721 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 1 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend its 2 Complaint. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter suitable for 3 disposition without oral argument and therefore VACATES the hearing currently scheduled for 4 December 14, 2012. Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion and supporting memorandum, and for 5 good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in Plaintiff’s 6 memorandum of points and authorities. Plaintiff shall file its First Amended Complaint, attached 7 as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Charles T. Graves, within two (2) business days of the entry of 8 this Order. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 DATED: _____________________ 13 _____________________________________ THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PL.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:12-CV-1721 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?