Twitter, Inc. v. Skootle Corp. et al

Filing 81

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief to Continue Deadlines filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Graves, Charles) (Filed on 2/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DAVID H. KRAMER, SBN 168452 CHARLES T. GRAVES, SBN 197923 RIANA S. PFEFFERKORN, SBN 266817 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Email: dkramer@wsgr.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff TWITTER, INC. DOUGLAS W. COLT, SBN 210915 THOMAS E. WALLERSTEIN, SBN 232086 NICOLE M. NORRIS, SBN 222785 COLT / WALLERSTEIN LLP Shorebreeze II 255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 540 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 453-1980 Facsimile: (650) 453-2411 Attorneys for Defendants SKOOTLE CORP., JAMES KESTER, and TROY FALES 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 TWITTER, INC., a Delaware corporation, 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, v. SKOOTLE CORP., a Tennessee corporation; JAMES KESTER, an individual; and TROY FALES, an individual, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-1721 SI Case No. 3:12-cv-1721 SI STIPULATED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE DEADLINES Date: Time: Place: Judge: March 1, 2013 3:00 p.m. Courtroom 10 Hon. Susan Illston 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and this Court’s Standing Order dated August 1, 2011, 2 Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) and Defendants Skootle Corp., James Kester, and Troy Fales 3 (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby respectfully request that the Court issue an order continuing 4 discovery deadlines in this case. 5 Because deposition scheduling issues require that some depositions take place in March 6 2013, after the current close of fact discovery on March 1, 2013, counsel for both parties have 7 conferred and agreed to continue the current deadlines for discovery, and the agreed-upon 8 continuance would not affect the pre-trial conference or trial dates. Therefore, the parties hereby 9 stipulate to the following schedule and attach a Proposed Order accordingly: 10 Monday, April 1, 2013: Close of non-expert fact discovery 11 Monday, April 15, 2013: Deadline for parties to designate experts 12 Tuesday, April 30, 2013: Deadline for parties’ rebuttal to designation of experts 13 Thursday, May 9, 2013: Close of expert discovery 14 Monday, May 13, 2013: Dispositive motion filing deadline 15 Monday, June 3, 2013: Opposition filings due for dispositive motions filed May 13 16 Monday, June 10, 2013: Reply filings due for dispositive motions filed May 13 17 Monday, June 24, 2013: Last court day by which Dispositive Motions are heard 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 Dated: February 7, 2013 20 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC By: 21 /s Charles T. Graves Charles T. Graves tgraves@wsgr.com Attorneys for Plaintiff TWITTER, INC. 22 23 24 Dated: February 7, 2013 COLT / WALLERSTEIN LLP By: 25 26 /s Douglas W. Colt Douglas W. Colt dcolt@coltwallerstein.com Attorneys for Defendants SKOOTLE CORP., JAMES KESTER, and TROY FALES -1- 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-1721 SI 1 CERTIFICATION 2 I, Charles T. Graves, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used 3 to file the Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief to Continue Deadlines and 4 [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Douglas W. 5 Colt has concurred in this filing. 6 DATED: February 7, 2013 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 7 8 By: 9 s/Charles T. Graves Charles T. Graves 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2CERTIFICATION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-1721 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?