Vargas et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al

Filing 61

NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/2/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 JUAN VARGAS AND HILDA VARGAS, 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. No. C 12-02008 WHA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., aka WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND F/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB, FORMERLY KNOWN AS WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, AS BENEFICIARY; CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, a CALIFORNIA CORPORATION and all persons claiming by, through, or under such entities or persons; and all persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real property described in the complaint adverse to Plaintiffs title thereto, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT Defendants. / 18 19 After reviewing the written submissions, the Court is of the view that oral argument is 20 unnecessary and will proceed to issue an order soon and to vacate the hearing set for January 17. 21 If, however, one counsel advises the Court in writing by NOON ON JANUARY 7 that most or all of 22 the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law school 23 (see Supplemental Order, dkt. no. 3 at ΒΆ 6), then the hearing will remain in place in order to 24 provide that opportunity. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 2, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?