Vargas et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
Filing
61
NOTICE RE ORAL ARGUMENT (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/2/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
JUAN VARGAS AND HILDA VARGAS,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. C 12-02008 WHA
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., aka WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A. AND F/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE
FSB, FORMERLY KNOWN AS WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB, AS BENEFICIARY; CAL-WESTERN
RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, a
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION and all persons
claiming by, through, or under such entities or persons;
and all persons unknown, claiming any legal or
equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real
property described in the complaint adverse to Plaintiffs
title thereto, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
NOTICE RE
ORAL ARGUMENT
Defendants.
/
18
19
After reviewing the written submissions, the Court is of the view that oral argument is
20
unnecessary and will proceed to issue an order soon and to vacate the hearing set for January 17.
21
If, however, one counsel advises the Court in writing by NOON ON JANUARY 7 that most or all of
22
the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer of four or fewer years out of law school
23
(see Supplemental Order, dkt. no. 3 at ΒΆ 6), then the hearing will remain in place in order to
24
provide that opportunity.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 2, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?