Hayes v. Donahoe

Filing 27

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/6/2013 10:00 AM; Pretrial Conference set for 9/26/2013 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 10/7/2013 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 10/7/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/15/12. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 1 MICHAEL G. HAYES, 12 13 Plaintiff, v. No. C 12-02964 RS CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER PATRICK P. DONAHOE, POSTMASTER 14 GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, 15 Defendant. 16 ____________________________________/ 17 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a 18 Case Management Conference on October 15, 2012. After considering the Joint Case 19 Management Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for 20 the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 21 1. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. 22 The parties are hereby REFERRED to the ADR Department for a discussion of their 23 settlement options. 24 2. DISCOVERY. 25 On or before June 7, 2013 discovery related to claim construction shall be completed by 26 the parties. Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per side; 27 (b) twenty-five (25) interrogatories per side, including all discrete subparts; (c) a reasonable 28 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER number of requests for production of documents or for inspection per side; and (d) a reasonable 2 number of requests for admission per side. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 1 3. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witnesses and opinions shall proceed as follows: A. On or before June 21, 2013, parties will designate experts in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). B. On or before July 5, 2013, parties will designate their supplemental and rebuttal experts in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). C. On or before July 26, 2013, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed. 4. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case 12 Management Conference shall be held on June 6, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th 13 Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The 14 parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference. 15 5. PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to 16 Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard on August 22, 2013 at 1:30 p.m., in 17 Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 18 California. 19 6. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on 20 September 26, 2013 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 21 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the 22 case shall attend personally. 23 7. TRIAL DATE. A jury trial shall commence on October 7, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., in 24 Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 25 California. 26 27 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 28 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 DATED: 11/15/12 _______________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?