Garza v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 84

Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding held at Solano State Prison. Case settled. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 3/21/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EDWARD GARZA, Case No. 12-cv-03354-CRB (NJV) Plaintiff, 8 v. REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING 9 10 ANTHONY HEDGPETH, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 A settlement conference was held on March 14, 2014 at Solano State Prison, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the 16 proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: 17 (X ) Plaintiff, Edward Garza Pro Se. 18 ( ) Warden or warden’s representative 19 (X ) Office of the California Attorney General, Jennifer Nygaard 20 (X ) Other: Defense counsel Daniel Meagher and Mark Muller and CDCR counsel 21 Patricia Lee. 22 (2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear: 23 _____________________________________________________________________ 24 (3) The outcome of the proceeding was: 25 (X ) The case has been completely settled. 26 ( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint 27 stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet 28 attached remain for this Court to resolve. 1 2 3 4 5 ( ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 21, 2014 ______________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?