Garza v. Hedgpeth et al
Filing
84
Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding held at Solano State Prison. Case settled. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 3/21/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
EDWARD GARZA,
Case No. 12-cv-03354-CRB (NJV)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER
EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING
9
10
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
A settlement conference was held on March 14, 2014 at Solano State Prison, and the
results of that proceeding are indicated below:
(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the
16
proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:
17
(X ) Plaintiff, Edward Garza Pro Se.
18
( ) Warden or warden’s representative
19
(X ) Office of the California Attorney General, Jennifer Nygaard
20
(X ) Other: Defense counsel Daniel Meagher and Mark Muller and CDCR counsel
21
Patricia Lee.
22
(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:
23
_____________________________________________________________________
24
(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:
25
(X ) The case has been completely settled.
26
( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint
27
stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet
28
attached remain for this Court to resolve.
1
2
3
4
5
( ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 21, 2014
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?